The Rise of Artificial Intelligence in Education and the Risk of “Outsourcing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66104/10w6gv94Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence; Education; Critical Thinking; Cognitive Autonomy.Abstract
The rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education has sparked intense debate regarding its cognitive, pedagogical, and social implications, particularly in relation to the growing risk of “outsourcing thinking.” The integration of intelligent systems into study routines, assessment processes, and academic production has increased efficiency and personalized learning, yet it has also raised concerns about the potential decline in students’ intellectual autonomy. This article critically examines this phenomenon, discussing how excessive reliance on automated tools may undermine essential skills such as critical thinking, creativity, problem‑solving, and argumentative reasoning. Through a comprehensive literature review of contemporary authors — including Neil Selwyn, Ruha Benjamin, Andreas Schleicher, Shoshana Zuboff, George Siemens, Ben Williamson, Safiya Noble, and Wayne Holmes — the study explores how AI is reshaping educational practices, influencing public policy, and redefining the role of teachers. These authors offer complementary perspectives on algorithmic surveillance, digital inequalities, technological governance, automation ethics, and the sociocultural impacts of educational digitalization. The analysis reveals that although AI can expand learning opportunities, it may also reinforce cognitive dependencies, reduce student agency, and intensify intellectual standardization. The article argues that contemporary education must balance technological innovation with the preservation of human autonomy, ensuring that AI does not become a substitute for reasoning. It concludes that teacher training, ethical regulation, and the development of critical digital competencies are essential to mitigate risks and promote responsible AI use. Finally, the article suggests directions for future research, including investigations into long‑term cognitive impacts, hybrid pedagogical models, and algorithmic governance policies in education.
Downloads
References
BENJAMIN, Ruha. Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2019. (Usada no artigo como base teórica para Ruha Benjamin – 2020)
FERREIRA, Nádia Aparecida de Souza. Estado da arte: um estudo bibliográfico. Educação & Sociedade, Campinas, v. 23, n. 79, p. 257–272, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-73302002000300013
HOLMES, Wayne. Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promise and Peril. London: UCL Knowledge Lab, 2022. (Usado no artigo como Wayne Holmes – 2024, com base em sua produção contínua)
MOROSINI, Marília Costa. Estado da arte em educação: desafios e possibilidades. Educação em Revista, Belo Horizonte, v. 31, n. 1, p. 15–38, 2015.
NOBLE, Safiya Umoja. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York: NYU Press, 2018. (Usada no artigo como Safiya Noble – 2020) DOI: https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479833641.001.0001
ROMANOWSKI, Joana Paulin; ENS, Rosa Maria. As pesquisas denominadas do tipo “estado da arte” em educação. Diálogo Educacional, Curitiba, v. 6, n. 19, p. 37–50, 2006.
SCHLEICHER, Andreas. World Class: How to Build a 21st-Century School System. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2018. (Usado no artigo como Andreas Schleicher – 2022, considerando sua produção contínua na OCDE)
SELWYN, Neil. Should Robots Replace Teachers? AI and the Future of Education. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2019. (Usado no artigo como Neil Selwyn – 2021)
SIEMENS, George. Knowing Knowledge. Vancouver: EdTech Books, 2022. (Usado no artigo como George Siemens – 2023)
WILLIAMSON, Ben. Big Data in Education: The Digital Future of Learning, Policy and Practice. London: SAGE Publications, 2017. (Usado no artigo como Ben Williamson – 2021, com base em sua produção contínua sobre dataficação)
ZUBOFF, Shoshana. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: PublicAffairs, 2019. (Usada no artigo como Shoshana Zuboff – 2020)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ruth Trindade Ferreira , Maísa Ferreira Machado , Ana Beatriz Cardoso Duarte , Jefferson Fellipe Jahnke, Hilke Carlayle de Medeiros Costa, José Carlos Guimarães Junior, Tânia Lúcia Viana de Souza , William Kartes Wanderley do Nascimento
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits the sharing of the work with proper acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal;
Authors are authorized to enter into separate, additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., posting in an institutional repository or publishing it as a book chapter), provided that authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly acknowledged, and that the work is adapted to the template of the respective repository;
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this may lead to productive exchanges and increase the impact and citation of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access);
Authors are responsible for correctly providing their personal information, including name, keywords, abstracts, and other relevant data, thereby defining how they wish to be cited. The journal’s editorial board is not responsible for any errors or inconsistencies in these records.
PRIVACY POLICY
The names and email addresses provided to this journal will be used exclusively for the purposes of this publication and will not be made available for any other purpose or to third parties.
Note: All content of the work is the sole responsibility of the author and the advisor.
