Institutional Sustainability as a Dynamic Capability in the Peripheral State

Authors

  • KAROL JEFESSOM ALVES DE SOUSA Secretaria de Estado do Planejamento do Piauí

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66104/mwnr9752

Keywords:

Institutional sustainability; Dynamic capability; Peripheral state; People governance; State capacity.

Abstract

Institutional sustainability has often been treated as a normative attribute associated with organizational stability and administrative integrity. However, in peripheral state contexts marked by political instability and bureaucratic fragility, this notion requires analytical reinterpretation. This article reconceptualizes institutional sustainability as a dynamic state capability, understood as a cumulative process of bureaucratic capital retention, organizational learning, and adaptive administrative reconfiguration. Drawing on a theoretical-analytical approach grounded in a systematized review of the literature on state capacity, historical institutionalism, and dynamic capabilities, the study proposes an integrative model that shifts the focus from formal institutional design to the internal mechanisms responsible for preserving and renewing state competencies over time. It argues that people governance constitutes a central infrastructure of this adaptive dynamic. The findings suggest that, in peripheral states, institutional continuity depends less on formal normative arrangements and more on the intertemporal consolidation of organizational capacities capable of sustaining strategic coherence across political cycles.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BENINGTON, John; MOORE, Mark H. Public value: theory and practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.

CARDOSO, Fernando Henrique; FALETTO, Enzo. Dependência e desenvolvimento na América Latina. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 1970.

DENZIN, Norman K.; LINCOLN, Yvonna S. The Sage handbook of qualitative research. 5. ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2018.

DIMAGGIO, Paul J.; POWELL, Walter W. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, v. 48, n. 2, p. 147–160, 1983.

EVANS, Peter. Embedded autonomy: states and industrial transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.

KETTL, Donald F. The transformation of governance: public administration for twenty-first century America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2021.

MARCH, James G.; OLSEN, Johan P. Rediscovering institutions: the organizational basis of politics. New York: Free Press, 1989.

MAZZUCATO, Mariana; KATTEL, Rainer. Mission-oriented innovation policy and dynamic capabilities in the public sector. Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford, v. 29, n. 1, p. 1–19, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtz054.

MOORE, Mark H. Creating public value: strategic management in government. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995.

OECD. Government at a glance 2023. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2023. Disponível em: https://www.oecd.org/gov/government-at-a-glance-2023.htm. Acesso em: 19 fev. 2026.

OECD. Trust and public governance 2024. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2024. Disponível em: https://www.oecd.org/gov/trust-in-government.htm. Acesso em: 19 fev. 2026.

TEECE, David J.; PISANO, Gary; SHUEN, Amy. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, v. 18, n. 7, p. 509–533, 1997.

TRANFIELD, David; DENYER, David; SMART, Palminder. Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, v. 14, n. 3, p. 207–222, 2003.

WORLD BANK. Worldwide governance indicators 2022. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2022. Disponível em: https://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/. Acesso em: 19 fev. 2026.

Published

2026-03-01

How to Cite

Institutional Sustainability as a Dynamic Capability in the Peripheral State. (2026). REMUNOM, 13(01), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.66104/mwnr9752