THE CLIMATE EMERGENCY AS A HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION: AN ANALYSIS OF RECENT DECISIONS BY THE UN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66104/jkyvdf85

Keywords:

Climate emergency; Human Rights; UN Human Rights Committee; Right to life; International State responsibility.

Abstract

This article examines the climate emergency from the perspective of International Human Rights Law, analyzing its characterization as a factor of fundamental rights violations, with particular emphasis on recent decisions of the United Nations Human Rights Committee. Climate change, by intensifying extreme events, degrading essential ecosystems, and deepening structural inequalities, directly affects rights such as life, human dignity, health, housing, and the self-determination of peoples, posing unprecedented challenges to State responsibility at the international level. The research adopts a qualitative, legal-dogmatic approach based on the analysis of individual communications, general comments, and international normative instruments, with particular attention to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. It is demonstrated that the Committee has advanced an evolutive interpretation of the right to life, recognizing that serious, foreseeable, and preventable climate-related risks may constitute human rights violations, depending on the assessment of relevant legal factors in the specific case. Finally, the article discusses the advances, limits, and challenges of this jurisprudential development, particularly with regard to causality, territoriality, and the effectiveness of decisions in addressing the global climate emergency, as well as examining prospects for strengthening the international protection of human rights in the face of the climate emergency.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BOYLE, Alan. Climate change, sustainable development, and human rights. In: Research Handbook on International Law and Climate Change. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2018.

BROWN WEISS, Edith. In fairness to future generations: international law, common patrimony, and intergenerational equity. Tokyo: United Nations University, 1989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004633544

COMISSÃO DE DIREITO INTERNACIONAL. Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts. 2001.

CORTE INTERAMERICANA DE DIREITOS HUMANOS. Opinião Consultiva OC-23/17: Medio ambiente y derechos humanos. San José, 2017.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. KlimaSeniorinnen v. Switzerland. Judgment, 2024.

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE. Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. Uruguay). Judgment of 20 April 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1705810

INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.

INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC). Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844

KNOX, John H. Human rights obligations relating to the enjoyment of a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment. Geneva: United Nations, 2018.

LAHORE HIGH COURT. Leghari v. Federation of Pakistan. Judgment, 2015.

RAJAMANI, Lavanya. Innovation and experimentation in the international climate change regime. Leiden: Brill, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004444409

SHUE, Henry. Climate justice: vulnerability and protection. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.

SUPREME COURT OF COLOMBIA. Future Generations v. Ministry of Environment. Judgment, 2018.

SUPREME COURT OF THE NETHERLANDS. Urgenda Foundation v. State of the Netherlands. Judgment, 2019.

UNITED NATIONS. Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees. Geneva, 1951.

UNITED NATIONS. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. New York: United Nations, 1966.

UNITED NATIONS. Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. Rio de Janeiro, 1992.

UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME (UNEP). Global Climate Litigation Report. Nairobi: UNEP, 2023.

UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE. Billy et al. v. Australia. Communication No. 3624/2019. CCPR/C/135/D/3624/2019. Geneva, 2022.

UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE. General Comment No. 36 on Article 6 (Right to Life). CCPR/C/GC/36. Geneva, 2018.

UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE. Ioane Teitiota v. New Zealand. Communication No. 2728/2016. CCPR/C/127/D/2728/2016. Geneva, 2020.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; CANADA. Trail Smelter Arbitration (United States v. Canada). Reports of International Arbitral Awards, v. 3, p. 1905–1982, 1941.

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

THE CLIMATE EMERGENCY AS A HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION: AN ANALYSIS OF RECENT DECISIONS BY THE UN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE. (2026). REMUNOM, 13(08), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.66104/jkyvdf85