TEACHER TRAINING IN CARUTAPERA (MA): BETWEEN PUBLIC POLICIES AND PEDAGOGICAL PRACTICESTEACHER TRAINING IN CARUTAPERA (MA): BETWEEN PUBLIC POLICIES AND PEDAGOGICAL PRACTICES

Authors

  • Eliezer Maia Martins Universidad Leonardo da Vinci
  • Hélida Rosa Silva Universidad Leonardo da Vinci
  • Jane Cleia Cruz Correa World University Ecumenical.
  • Juscelino Pereira Martins Universidad Europea del Atlántico
  • Maria Elvira Silva Freitas Universidad Leonardo da Vinci
  • Wedson da Silva Ribeiro Universidad Leonardo da Vinci

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66104/w2w08v20

Keywords:

Teacher education; Public policies; Pedagogical practice; Higher education interiorization; Basic education.

Abstract

This study analyzes teacher education in the municipality of Carutapera (MA), focusing on the relationship between public policies for access to higher education and pedagogical practices developed in basic education. The research aims to understand to what extent public undergraduate teacher training programs contribute to teaching practice, as well as to identify the main challenges involved in this process. This is a qualitative study with a descriptive and exploratory approach, conducted with basic education teachers who graduated from public institutions. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews applied in a digital format, and analyzed using content analysis techniques. The results indicate that policies aimed at the interiorization of higher education have significantly contributed to expanding access to teacher education in the municipality. However, weaknesses persist regarding the quality of training, particularly in terms of the articulation between theory and practice, the use of educational technologies, and the structural conditions of educational institutions. Furthermore, the findings highlight the central role of practical experience in the development of teaching competence, often compensating for gaps in initial training. It is concluded that, although important advances have been made in access to teacher education, further investments are needed to improve the quality of training and its alignment with local specificities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BARDIN, Laurence. Análise de conteúdo. São Paulo: Edições 70, 2011.

BRASIL. Diretrizes Curriculares Nacionais para a Formação de Professores. Brasília: MEC, 2019.

BRASIL. Lei de Diretrizes e Bases da Educação Nacional. Brasília: MEC, 1996.

FLICK, Uwe. Uma introdução à pesquisa qualitativa. 3. ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2009.

GIL, Antônio Carlos. Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. 6. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2008.

LIBÂNEO, José Carlos. Didática. São Paulo: Cortez, 1994.

MINAYO, Maria Cecília de Souza. O desafio do conhecimento: pesquisa qualitativa em saúde. 14. ed. São Paulo: Hucitec, 2014.

NÓVOA, Antônio. Os professores e sua formação. Lisboa: Dom Quixote, 1992.

PIMENTA, Selma Garrido. Saberes pedagógicos e atividade docente. São Paulo: Cortez, 1999.

SHULMAN, Lee. Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 1986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1175860

TARDIF, Maurice. Saberes docentes e formação profissional. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2002.

Published

2026-06-02

How to Cite

TEACHER TRAINING IN CARUTAPERA (MA): BETWEEN PUBLIC POLICIES AND PEDAGOGICAL PRACTICESTEACHER TRAINING IN CARUTAPERA (MA): BETWEEN PUBLIC POLICIES AND PEDAGOGICAL PRACTICES. (2026). REMUNOM, 13(11), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.66104/w2w08v20