PRELIMINARY DIAGNOSTICS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY IN GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS: CONTRIBUTIONS TOWARDS A METHODOLOGY ALIGNED WITH EUROPEAN UNION REQUIREMENTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66104/kx2e4735Keywords:
geographical indications, environmental sustainability, european union, territorial governance, innovationAbstract
This article presents a preliminary diagnosis of environmental sustainability in Brazilian Geographical Indications (GIs), aiming to propose an evaluative instrument aligned with European Union regulatory requirements. The research distinguishes three regulatory planes: (i) environmental requirements applicable to commodity chains exported to the EU, notably the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR – Regulation (EU) 2023/2772); (ii) EU-specific GI protection norms, such as Regulation (EU) 2024/1143; and (iii) voluntary or strategic territorial sustainability criteria. For export-oriented GIs - particularly those linked to agricultural products such as coffee, cocoa, and beef - the EUDR constitutes a concrete regulatory requirement, with obligations for traceability and proof of deforestation-free supply chains. For export-oriented GIs operating in regulated commodity chains, market experience has consistently demonstrated that EUDR compliance is a market-access condition, not merely a competitive differentiator. A qualitative and exploratory methodology was adopted, including document analysis and application of a Multicriteria Diagnostic Protocol (MDP) to five agri-food GIs, organized into five thematic axes: natural resource management, biodiversity, climate mitigation, sustainable innovation, and community participation. The findings reveal localized advances in innovation and institutional partnerships, alongside significant gaps in resource monitoring, emission mitigation, and community engagement. Brazilian GIs remain at an early stage of environmental maturity. The study contributes by proposing a preliminary diagnostic instrument applicable to emerging contexts, providing support for public policy development, governance strengthening, and strategic alignment with international regulatory frameworks.
Downloads
References
Barbier, E. B. (1987). The concept of sustainable economic development. Environmental Conservation, 14(2), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892900011449 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892900011449
Barham, E. (2003). Translating terroir: The global challenge of French AOC labeling. Journal of Rural Studies, 19(1), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00052-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00052-9
Belletti, G.; Marescotti, A.; Touzard, J. M. (2017). Geographical Indications, Public Goods, and Sustainable Development: The Roles of Actors’ Strategies and Public Policies. World Development, 98, 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.05.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.05.004
Centro do Comércio de Café de Minas Gerais – CCCMG. (2025, janeiro 17). Café da Região do Cerrado Mineiro registra crescimento de 160% na certificação de origem em 2024. CCCMG. Disponível em: https://cccmg.com.br/destaque-2/cafe-da-regiao-do-cerrado-mineiro-registra-crescimento-de-160-na-certificacao-de-origem-em-2024/
Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone Publishing. Disponível em: https://proppg.ufersa.edu.br/wp-content/ uploads/sites/11/2016/10/Referencia-de-Lilian-Giesta-Triple-bottom-line-in-21-century-2.pdf
European Union. (2023). Regulation (EU) 2023/1115 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 2023 on geographical indication protection for craft and industrial products. EUR-Lex. Disponível em: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PT/TXT/?uri= CELEX%3A32023R1115
FAO; SINER-GI. (2009). Identification of Products Linked to Geographical Origin and Their Potential for Development: A Methodological Handbook. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Flores, S. S.; Falcade, I. (2022). Sustentabilidade Territorial e Indicações Geográficas: uma proposta de fatores para avaliação de oportunidades e barreiras nas IGs. Revista Brasileira De Gestão E Desenvolvimento Regional, 18(3). Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.54399/rbgdr.v18i3.6146 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54399/rbgdr.v18i3.6146
Global Reporting Initiative. (2021). Consolidated set of GRI sustainability reporting standards. Amsterdam: GRI. Disponível em: https://www.amauni.org/wp-content/uploads/ 2022/03/Set-of-GRI-Stnds-2021.pdf
Mazé, A. (2023). Geographical indications as global knowledge commons: Ostrom’s law on common intellectual property and collective action. Journal of Institutional Economics, 19(5), 789–805. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137423000036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137423000036
Niederle, P. A.; Aguiar, M.; Vitrolles, D. (2017). Governança e institucionalização das indicações geográficas no Brasil. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, 55(1), 31–50. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/1234-56781806-94790550102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1234-56781806-94790550105
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763
Ostrom, E. (2009). Prize Lecture: Beyond Markets and States – Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems. Nobel Prize Lecture, Estocolmo. Disponível em: https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/2009/ostrom/lecture/
Pecqueur, B. (2001). Qualité et développement territorial: L’hypothèse du panier de biens et de services territorialisés. Économie Rurale, 261(1), 37–49. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3406/ecoru.2001.5217 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/ecoru.2001.5217
Sylvander, B. (2004). Quality as a social construction: From conventions to institutional arrangements. In B. Sylvander, D. Barjolle, & F. Arfini (Eds.), The socio-economics of origin labelled products in agri-food supply chains: Spatial, institutional and co-ordination aspects (pp. 23–40). INRA/Università degli Studi di Parma.
Souza, M. J. F.; Silva, M. D. P., & Pereira, J. P. (2022). Sustentabilidade ambiental e indicações geográficas no Brasil: um olhar crítico sobre os instrumentos de certificação. Revista Desenvolvimento em Questão, 20(58), 120–142.
Tregear, A., Arfini, F.; Belletti, G.; Marescotti, A. (2007). Regional foods and rural development: The role of product qualification. Journal of Rural Studies, 23(1), 12–22. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.09.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.09.010
United Nations Global Compact. (2015). Guide to corporate sustainability: Shaping a sustainable future. New York: UNGC. Disponível em: https://d306pr3pise04h.cloudfront.net/ docs/publications%2FUN_Global_Compact_Guide_to_Corporate_Sustainability.pdf
Vieira, L. M.; Pedreira, B. C. (2021). Indicações Geográficas e Desenvolvimento Territorial Sustentável no Brasil: Desafios e Perspectivas. Revista Geografares, (42), 295–321. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.47456/geografares.v0i42.34917
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Me. Franciely Lorenzon Carvalho, Dr. Christian Mariani Lucas dos Santos

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits the sharing of the work with proper acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal;
Authors are authorized to enter into separate, additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., posting in an institutional repository or publishing it as a book chapter), provided that authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly acknowledged, and that the work is adapted to the template of the respective repository;
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this may lead to productive exchanges and increase the impact and citation of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access);
Authors are responsible for correctly providing their personal information, including name, keywords, abstracts, and other relevant data, thereby defining how they wish to be cited. The journal’s editorial board is not responsible for any errors or inconsistencies in these records.
PRIVACY POLICY
The names and email addresses provided to this journal will be used exclusively for the purposes of this publication and will not be made available for any other purpose or to third parties.
Note: All content of the work is the sole responsibility of the author and the advisor.
