INNOVATIVE IP-BASED CAPABILITY: A CONCEPTUAL MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66104/epnpw779Keywords:
Innovation management, Intellectual property, Foresight, Strategic innovation, SMEAbstract
Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are pivotal actors in the economic and social development of various nations, serving as essential engines for improving socioeconomic metrics, particularly in developing countries. Despite their importance, SMEs encounter numerous obstacles to growth, with innovation standing out as a critical strategic element for market survival and competitiveness. While often associated with large corporations, SMEs possess inherent characteristics that can facilitate innovation, yet they frequently struggle to quantify their innovativeness or identify necessary investment areas. This research gap is more pronounced in SMEs whose innovation outputs result in intellectual property (IP) assets, such as patents and trademarks. Strategic innovation management can be significantly optimized by incorporating foresight methodologies, which allow organizations to anticipate societal, environmental, and market shifts. Therefore, this paper proposes a conceptual framework designed to guide IP-intensive SMEs in evaluating their innovative capabilities. By integrating future prospection with capability assessment, the framework aims to assist these enterprises in designing more reliable and effective innovation strategies.
Downloads
References
ADEGBILE, Abiodun; SARPONG, David; MEISSNER, Dirk. Strategic foresight for innovation management: a review and research agenda. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, v. 14, n. 4, 2017. DOI: 10.1142/S0219877017500195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877017500195
ALI, M. A. et al. A multidimensional view of intellectual capital and dynamic innovative performance. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16030139
AYERBE, C.; BOULOS, C.; CASTELLANETA, F. Navigating protection mechanisms and innovation models: a literature-based configurational framework of intellectual property strategies. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103101
AZIATI, Abdul Hamid Nor et al. The relationship of technological innovation capabilities and business innovation capabilities on organization performance: preliminary findings of Malaysian food processing SMEs. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION (ICE), 2014, Bergamo. Proceedings… Bergamo, 2014. p. 1–8. DOI: 10.1109/ICE.2014.6871574. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2014.6871574
BAGHERI, Mahshid et al. Internationalization orientation in SMEs: the mediating role of technological innovation. Journal of International Management, v. 25, 2019, p. 121–139. DOI: 10.1016/j.intman.2018.08.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2018.08.002
BAREGHEH, A.; ROWLEY, J.; SAMBROOK, S. Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management Decision, v. 47, n. 8, 2009, p. 1323–1339. DOI: 10.1108/00251740910984578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740910984578
BATTAGLIA, Daniele; NEIROTTI, Paolo. Dealing with the tensions between innovation and internationalization in SMEs: a dynamic capability view. Journal of Small Business Management, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/00472778.2020.1711635. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2020.1711635
BATTISTELLA, Cinzia; DE TONI, Alberto F. A methodology of technological foresight: a proposal and field study. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, v. 78, 2011, p. 1029–1048. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.01.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.01.006
BLYTH, Michael James. Learning from the future through scenario planning. Scenario Planning, v. 5, n. 3, 2005, p. 1–12.
BRINK, Tove. SME routes for innovation collaboration with larger enterprises. Industrial Marketing Management, v. 64, 2017, p. 122–134. DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.01.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.01.010
BURT, George; NAIR, Anup Karath. Rigidities of imagination in scenario planning: strategic foresight through unlearning. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, v. 153, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119927. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119927
CHANGHUI, Yang; QIANG, Zhang; DING, Shuai. An evaluation method for innovation capability based on uncertain linguistic variables. Applied Mathematics and Computation, v. 256, 2015, p. 160–174. DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2014.12.154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2014.12.154
CONWAY, Maree. An overview of foresight methodologies. 2006.
CRUZ-CÁZARES, Claudio; BAYONA-SÁEZ, Cristina; GARCÍA-MARCO, Teresa. You can’t manage right what you can’t measure well: technological innovation efficiency. Research Policy, v. 42, n. 6–7, 2013, p. 1239–1250. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.03.012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.03.012
DAMANPOUR, Fariborz; ARAVIND, Deepa. Managerial innovation: conceptions, processes, and antecedents. Management and Organization Review, v. 8, n. 2, 2012, p. 423–454. DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00233.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00233.x
DEYASSA, K. Dynamic capabilities and innovation in SMEs: a systematic literature review of prior studies. 2023.
DUFVA, Mikko; KÖNNÖLÄ, Totti; KOIVISTO, Raija. Multi-layered foresight: lessons from regional foresight in Chile. Futures, v. 73, 2015, p. 100–111. DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2015.08.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2015.08.010
DUIJNE, Freija; BISHOP, Peter. Introduction to strategic foresight. Future Motions, 2018.
ELMI, S. A.; KINYUA, G. Strategic foresight and firm performance: a review of literature. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24940/theijbm/2022/v10/i5/BM2204-020
EJDYS, Joanna. Future oriented strategy for SMEs. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 156, 2014, p. 8–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.110
ETF – EXTERNAL TREND FUND EUROPE. Skills for the future. 2014.
GOGODZE, J. Measuring innovative capacities of the Georgia regions. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, v. 8, n. 3, 2013, p. 116–129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242013000400011
GOODWIN, Paul; WRIGHT, George. Enhancing strategy evaluation in scenario planning: a role for decision analysis. Journal of Management Studies, v. 38, n. 1, 2001. DOI: 10.1111/1467-6486.00225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00225
GRONUM, S.; VERREYNNE, M. L.; KASTELLE, T. The role of networks in small and medium-sized enterprise innovation and firm performance. Journal of Small Business Management, v. 50, 2012, p. 257–282. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-627X.2012.00353.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2012.00353.x
GRZEGORCZYK, T.; GŁOWIŃSKI, R. Patent management strategies: a review. 2020.
HADJINICOLAOU, N.; KADER, M.; ABDALLAH, I. Strategic innovation, foresight and the deployment of project portfolio management under mid-range planning conditions in medium-sized firms. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010080
HERLIANA, Sri. Regional innovation cluster for small and medium enterprises (SME): a triple helix concept. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 169, 2015, p. 151–160. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.297
HULT, G. Tomas M.; HURLEY, Robert F.; KNIGHT, Gary A. Innovativeness: its antecedents and impact on business performance. Industrial Marketing Management, v. 33, 2004, p. 429–438. DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2003.08.015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2003.08.015
JABEEN, Fauzia; FAISAL, Mohd Nishat; MATROUSHI, Huda Al; FAROUK, Sherine. Determinants of innovation decisions among Emirati female-owned small and medium enterprises. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, v. 11, n. 4, 2019, p. 408–434. DOI: 10.1108/IJGE-02-2019-0033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJGE-02-2019-0033
JOSHI, Ankur; KALE, Saket; CHANDEL, Satish; PAL, Dinesh Kumar. Likert scale: explored and explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, v. 7, n. 4, 2015, p. 396–403. DOI: 10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975
JUNG, Hyejin; HWANG, Jung Tae; KIM, Byung-Keun. Does R&D investment increase SME survival during a recession? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 137, 2018, p. 190–198. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.042. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.042
KHADAN, Jeetendra. Estimating the effects of human capital constraints on innovation in the Caribbean. Economies, v. 6, n. 33, 2018. DOI: 10.3390/economies6020033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/economies6020033
KIM, Seo Kyun; LEE, Bong Gyou; PARK, Beom Soo; OH, Kyoung Seok. The effect of R&D, technology commercialization capabilities and innovation performance. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, v. 17, n. 4, 2011. DOI: 10.3846/20294913.2011.603481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2011.603481
KONONIUK, Anna. Foresight in SME companies. Journal of Machine Construction and Maintenance, n. 1, 2017, p. 109–115.
KONONIUK, Anna; GLIŃSK, Ewa. Foresight in a small enterprise: a case study. In: INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT (ICEM), 20., 2015. Proceedings. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 213, 2015, p. 971–976. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.513
LAU, Antonio K. W.; YAM, Richard C. M.; TANG, Esther P. Y. The impact of technological innovation capabilities on innovation performance: an empirical study in Hong Kong. Journal of Science and Technology Policy in China, v. 1, n. 2, 2010, p. 163–186. DOI: 10.1108/17585521011059893. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17585521011059893
LEE, Yongho; SHIN, Juneseuk; PARK, Yongtae. The changing pattern of SMEs’ innovativeness through business model globalization. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, v. 79, 2012, p. 832–842. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.10.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.10.008
LIN, Hsing-Er; McDONOUGH III, Edward F.; LIN, Shu-Jou; LIN, Carol Yeh-Yun. Managing the exploitation/exploration paradox: the role of a learning capability and innovation ambidexterity. Journal of Product Innovation Management, v. 30, n. 2, 2013, p. 262–278. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00998.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00998.x
MAGISTRETTI, S.; ARDITO, L.; MESSENI PETRUZZELLI, A. Framing the microfoundations of design thinking as a dynamic capability for innovation: reconciling theory and practice. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12586
MILSHINA, Yulia; VISHNEVSKIY, Konstantin. Potentials of collaborative foresight for SMEs. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, v. 30, n. 6, 2018. DOI: 10.1080/09537325.2017.1406906. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2017.1406906
NADA, Nader; ALI, Zulfiqar. Service value creation capability model to assess the service innovation capability in SMEs. Procedia CIRP, v. 30, 2015, p. 390–395. DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.218
NATÁRIO, Maria Manuela Santos; OLIVEIRA, Pedro Miguel. Portuguese SME innovation sources: trends of the last decade. Proceedings, v. 29, 2018. Disponible at: https://aisel.aisnet.org/capsi2018/29. Accessed on: January 28, 2026.
NEEF, Andreas; DAHEIM, Cornelia. Corporate foresight: the European perspective. In: WAGNER, Caroline S. (org.). Foresight, innovation, and strategy: toward a wiser future. Bethesda: World Future Society, 2005. p. 223–241.
NIKZAD, R. Small and medium-sized enterprises, intellectual property, and public policy. Science and Public Policy, v. 42, 2015, p. 176–187. DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scu038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scu038
OBRADOVIĆ, T.; VLAČIĆ, B.; DABIĆ, M. Open innovation in the manufacturing industry: a review and research agenda. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102221
OECD; EUROSTAT. Oslo manual 2018: guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovation. 4. ed. Paris: OECD, 2018. (The measurement of scientific, technological and innovation activities). DOI: 10.1787/9789264304604-en. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en
OKAMURO, Hiroyuki; NISHIMURA, Junichi; COLOMBO, Massimo; STAM, Erik. SME policy faced with development of financial technology: promoting SME R&D and innovation. Japão: G20, 2019.
PALIOKAITĖ, A.; PAČĖSA, N. The relationship between organisational foresight and organisational ambidexterity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 101, 2015, p. 165–181. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.03.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.03.004
PAULA, Fábio de Oliveira; SILVA, Jorge Ferreira. The impact of different types of innovation and governmental support in the performance of firms: the case of Central and Eastern Europe manufacturing SMEs. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, v. 17, n. 4, 2019. DOI: 10.1590/1679-395174365x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395174365x
PERDOMO-ORTIZ, Jesús; GONZÁLEZ-BENITO, Javier; GALENDE, Jesús. Total quality management as a forerunner of business innovation capability. Technovation, v. 26, n. 10, 2006, p. 1170–1185. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2005.09.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2005.09.008
PIERRE, Antonie; FERNANDEZ, Anne-Sophie. Going deeper into SMEs’ innovation capacity: an empirical exploration of innovation capacity factors. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, v. 25, n. 1, 2018, p. 139–181. DOI: 10.3917/jie.pr1.0019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.pr1.0019
QING, Li. A novel Likert scale based on fuzzy sets theory. Expert Systems with Applications, v. 40, 2013, p. 1609–1618. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.09.015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.09.015
RAJAPATHIRANA, R. P. Jayani; HUI, Yan. Relationship between innovation capability, innovation type, and firm performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, v. 3, n. 1, 2018, p. 44–55. DOI: 10.1016/j.jik.2017.06.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2017.06.002
RASSENFOSSE, G. How SMEs exploit their intellectual property assets: evidence from survey data. Small Business Economics, v. 39, n. 2, 2012, p. 437–452. DOI: 10.1007/s11187-010-9313-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-010-9313-4
RAYMOND, Louis; ST-PIERRE, Josée. R&D as a determinant of innovation in manufacturing SMEs: an attempt at empirical clarification. Technovation, v. 30, 2010, p. 48–56. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2009.05.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.05.005
RIBAU, Cláudia P.; MOREIRA, António C.; RAPOSO, Mário. SMEs innovation capabilities and export performance: an entrepreneurial orientation view. Journal of Business Economics and Management, v. 18, n. 5, 2017, p. 920–934. DOI: 10.3846/16111699.2017.1352534. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2017.1352534
ROHRBECK, René; GEMÜNDEN, Hans Georg. Making your R&D future proof: the roles of corporate foresight in innovation management. In: PORTLAND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY (PICMET), 2009, Portland. Proceedings… Portland, 2009, p. 835–842. DOI: 10.1109/PICMET.2009.5262043. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/PICMET.2009.5262043
ROHRBECK, René; BATTISTELLA, Cinzia; HUIZINGH, Eelko. Corporate foresight: an emerging field with a rich tradition. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 101, 2015, p. 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.002
ROHRBECK, René; KUM, Menes Etingue. Corporate foresight and its impact on firm performance: a longitudinal analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 129, 2018, p. 105–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.013
ROSENBUSCH, Nina; BRINCKMANN, Jan; BAUSCH, Andreas. Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, v. 26, 2011, p. 441–457. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.12.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.12.002
RUFF, F. The advanced role of corporate foresight in innovation and strategic management: reflections on practical experiences from the automotive industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 101, 2015, p. 37–48. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.07.013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.07.013
SACIO-SZYMAŃSKA, Anna; KONONIUK, Anna; TOMMEI, Stefano. Mobilizing corporate foresight potential among V4 countries: assumptions, rationales and methodology. Procedia Engineering, v. 182, p. 635–642, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.170 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.170
SARITAS, Ozcan. Systemic foresight methodology. In: MEISSNER, Dirk; GOKHBERG, Leonid; SOKOLOV, Alexander (org.). Science, technology and innovation policy for the future. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer, 2013. cap. 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31827-6_6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31827-6_6
SAUNILA, Minna. Performance measurement approach for innovation capability in SMEs. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, v. 65, n. 2, p. 162–176, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-08-2014-0123 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-08-2014-0123
SAUNILA, M. Innovation capability in SMEs: a systematic review of the literature. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.11.002
SCHOEMAKER, Paul J. H. Scenario planning: a tool for strategic thinking. MIT Sloan Management Review, v. 36, n. 2, 1995.
SLAUGHTER, Richard A. Knowledge creation, futures methodologies and the integral agenda. Foresight, v. 3, n. 5, p. 407–418, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680110697129 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680110697129
SULISTIYANI, Rina; HARWIKI, Wiwiek. How SMEs build innovation capability based on knowledge sharing behavior? Phenomenological approach. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 219, p. 741–747, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.070 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.070
SZALAVETZ, Andrea. Industry 4.0 and capability development in manufacturing subsidiaries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 145, p. 384–395, ago. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.027
SZCZYGIELSKI, Krzysztof; GRABOWSKI, Wojciech; PAMUKCU, Mehmet Teoman; TANDOGAN, Vedat Sinan. Does government support for private innovation matter? Firm-level evidence from two catching-up countries. Research Policy, v. 46, n. 1, p. 219–237, fev. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.10.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.10.009
TIBERIUS, V.; SCHWARZER, H.; ROIG DOBÓN, S. Radical innovations: between established knowledge and future research opportunities. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2020.09.001
VALDEZ-JUÁREZ, Luis Enrique; GALLARDO-VÁZQUEZ, Dolores; RAMOS-ESCOBAR, Elva Alicia; LIMÓN-ULLOA, Roberto. ISO 14001 and ISO 26001 as agents of change in SMEs. Journal of Management and Sustainability, v. 9, n. 1, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/jms.v9n1p32 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/jms.v9n1p32
VECCHIATO, Ricardo; DO, Hang; BLACKBURN, Robert; PIERRAKIS, Yannis. Technology foresight for growth and productivity: case study of UK digital health SMEs. In: Institute for Small Business and Entrepreneurship (ISBE) Conference 2019: SPACE – Exploring New Frontiers and Entrepreneurial Places, 14–15 nov. 2019.
VÖRÖS, Joseph. A generic foresight process framework. Foresight, v. 5, n. 3, p. 10–21, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680310698379 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680310698379
VUORIO, Anna; TORKKELI, Lasse; SAINIO, Liisa-Maija. Service innovation and internationalization in SMEs: antecedents and profitability outcomes. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, v. 18, p. 92–123, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-019-00266-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-019-00266-z
WANG, Chun-Hsien; LU, Iuan-Yuan; CHEN, Chie-Bein. Evaluating firm technological innovation capability under uncertainty. Technovation, v. 28, p. 349–363, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.10.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.10.007
WANG, Xinchun; DASS, Mayukh. Building innovation capability: the role of top management innovativeness and relative-exploration orientation. Journal of Business Research, v. 76, p. 127–135, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.03.019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.03.019
YAM, Richard C. M.; GUAN, Jian Cheng; PUN, Kit Fai; TANG, Esther P. Y. An audit of technological innovation capabilities in Chinese firms: some empirical findings in Beijing, China. Research Policy, v. 33, n. 8, p. 1123–1140, out. 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.05.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.05.004
YANG, Changhui; QIU, Liwei; DING, Shuai. Evaluation method on innovation capability of innovative enterprises based on experts’ preference. Operations Research and Management Science, n. 1, p. 202–208, 2015. DOI informado apresenta inconsistência com o periódico.
YIBO, Lv; JINGQIN, Su. Research on the structural evaluation of innovation ability of small and medium-sized enterprises from the perspective of innovation process. Science and Technology Management, n. 8, p. 58–64, 2011.
YU, Chuanpeng; ZHANG, Zhengang; LIN, Chunpei; WU, Yenchun Jim. Knowledge creation process and sustainable competitive advantage: the role of technological innovation capabilities. Sustainability, v. 9, n. 12, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122280 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122280
ZHANG, Xiao; YUE, Junju. Measurement model and its application of enterprise innovation capability based on matter-element extension theory. Procedia Engineering, v. 174, p. 275–280, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.136 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.136
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Juliana Krieger de Oliveira, Antônio Martins de Oliveira Junior
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits the sharing of the work with proper acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal;
Authors are authorized to enter into separate, additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., posting in an institutional repository or publishing it as a book chapter), provided that authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly acknowledged, and that the work is adapted to the template of the respective repository;
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this may lead to productive exchanges and increase the impact and citation of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access);
Authors are responsible for correctly providing their personal information, including name, keywords, abstracts, and other relevant data, thereby defining how they wish to be cited. The journal’s editorial board is not responsible for any errors or inconsistencies in these records.
PRIVACY POLICY
The names and email addresses provided to this journal will be used exclusively for the purposes of this publication and will not be made available for any other purpose or to third parties.
Note: All content of the work is the sole responsibility of the author and the advisor.
