Bottle Roll Tests for Kinetic Evaluation of Nickel Ores: Capabilities, Limitations, and Misinterpretations – A Critical Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66104/z4cay337Palabras clave:
Bottle roll testing; Heap leaching; Leaching kinetics; Scale-up; Acid consumption; Mass transfer.Resumen
Bottle roll testing is widely used to evaluate leaching performance due to its simplicity, low cost, and rapid execution. However, its results are often misinterpreted when extrapolated to industrial systems. This critical review examines the capabilities and limitations of bottle roll tests, with emphasis on their role in representing intrinsic chemical kinetics rather than full process behavior. Key discrepancies between laboratory and industrial conditions are analyzed, including particle-size effects, the absence of hydraulic constraints, limited representation of secondary-phase formation, and underestimation of acid consumption. Comparative analysis shows that bottle roll tests can achieve 85–95% extraction within 24–72 hours, whereas heap leaching systems typically reach 60–75% over 120–180 days, reflecting the influence of mass transfer, hydrodynamics, and time-dependent phenomena. The review highlights common scale-up pitfalls, particularly the misuse of kinetic fitting and laboratory acid consumption data for process design. A structured framework integrating bottle roll, column, and pilot testing is proposed to improve predictive capability. Data gaps are identified in coupled kinetic–transport modeling, long-term datasets, and mineralogical integration. It is concluded that bottle roll testing should be used as a screening and benchmarking tool, not as a standalone predictive method, and must be combined with scale-representative testing for reliable process evaluation.
Descargas
Referencias
1. Apua, C., & Madiba, M. (2021). Leaching kinetics and predictive models for elements extraction from copper oxide ore in sulphuric acid. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 121, 313–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2021.04.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2021.04.005
2. Astuti, W., Avista, D., Prihutami, P., Wanta, K. C., Prakosa, A., Anggara, F., & Petrus, H. T. B. M. (2024). Atmospheric leaching behavior and kinetics of nickel and cobalt from Halmahera limonite ore. International Journal of Technology, 15(4), 824–833. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v15i4.5607. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v15i4.5607
3. Bárzaga-Martell, L., Diaz-Quezada, S., Estay, H., & Ruiz-del-Solar, J. (2025). Estimation of copper grade, acid consumption, and moisture content in heap leaching using extended and unscented Kalman filters. Minerals, 15(5), 521. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15050521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/min15050521
4. Bare, G. T., Kalombo Mbayo, J. J., Ndlovu, S., Shemi, A., & Chipise, L. (2022). Mineralogical characterization and acid pretreatment of a gold calcine leach residue. Minerals, 12(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12010010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/min12010010
5. Cao, S., Chang, L., Bi, X. et al. Alkaline Hydrothermal Treatment and Leaching Kinetics of Silicon from Laterite Nickel Ore. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration 39, 129–138 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-021-00518-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-021-00518-4
6. Chetty, D., Nwaila, G. T., & Xakalashe, B. (2023). Fire and water: Geometallurgy and extractive metallurgy. Elements, 19(6), 365–370. https://doi.org/10.2138/gselements.19.6.365 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2138/gselements.19.6.365
7. Close, T. C. (2021). Kinetic analysis of leaching reactions in multi-component mineral systems (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Chemical Engineering). Massachusetts Institute of Technology. https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/130666.
8. Coelho, F. E. B., Balarini, J. C., Araújo, E. M. R., Miranda, T. L. S., Peres, A. E. C., Martins, A. H., & Salum, A. (2020). A population balance approach to predict the performance of continuous leaching reactors: Model validation in a pilot plant using a roasted zinc concentrate. Hydrometallurgy, 194, 105301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2020.105301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2020.105301
9. Dehaine, Q., Tijsseling, L. T., Glass, H. J., Törmänen, T., & Butcher, A. R. (2021). Geometallurgy of cobalt ores: A review. Minerals Engineering, 160, 106656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2020.106656. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2020.106656
10. Eksteen, J. J., Oraby, E. A., & Nguyen, V. (2020). Leaching and ion exchange based recovery of nickel and cobalt from a low-grade, serpentine-rich sulfide ore using an alkaline glycine lixiviant system. Minerals Engineering, 145, 106073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2019.106073. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2019.106073
11. Estay, H., Díaz-Quezada, S. Deconstructing the Leaching Ratio. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration 37, 1329–1337 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-020-00243-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-020-00243-4
12. Fagan-Endres, M. A., Odidi, M. D. & Harrison, S. T. L. (2023). Residence time distribution analysis of drip-irrigated beds—The effect of material and fluid properties with implications for heap leaching practice. Minerals, 13(2), 267. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13020267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/min13020267
13. Faraji, F., Alizadeh, A., Rashchi, F., & Mostoufi, N. (2020). Kinetics of leaching: A review. Reviews in Chemical Engineering, 38(2), 123–156. https://doi.org/10.1515/revce-2020-0040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/revce-2019-0073
14. Fernando, W. A. M., Ilankoon, I. M. S. K., Rabbani, A., & Chong, M. N. (2020). Applicability of pore networks to evaluate the inter-particle flow in heap leaching. Hydrometallurgy, 197, 105451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2020.105451 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2020.105451
15. Garces-Granda, A., Lapidus, G. T., & Restrepo-Baena, O. J. (2020). Thermal pretreatment effects on dissolution kinetics. Hydrometallurgy, 194, 105300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2020.105300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2020.105300
16. Guner, M. K., Bulut, G., Hassanzadeh, A., Lode, S., & Aasly, K. (2023). Automated mineralogy and diagnostic leaching studies on bulk sulfide flotation concentrate of a refractory gold ore. Minerals, 13(10), 1243. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13101243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/min13101243
17. He, F., Ma, B., Wang, C., Zuo, Y., & Chen, Y. (2022). Dissolution behavior and porous kinetics of limonitic laterite during nitric acid atmospheric leaching. Minerals Engineering, 185, 107671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2022.107671 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2022.107671
18. Jia, Y., Ruan, R., Qu, J., Tan, Q., Sun, H., & Niu, X. (2024). Multi-scale and trans-disciplinary research and technology developments of heap bioleaching. Minerals, 14(8), 808. https://doi.org/10.3390/min14080808. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/min14080808
19. Kalbe, U., Piechotta, C. & Bandow, N. Comparing PFAS analysis in batch leaching and column leaching tests. Environ Sci Pollut Res 31, 65233–65251 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-35510-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-35510-0
20. Kang, H., Kim, J., Lee, J., Lee, D., Ko, D., & Kim, H. (2026). Early-stage temperature-dependent leaching kinetics and mechanisms of saprolitic and limonitic nickel laterite ores under atmospheric conditions. Minerals Engineering, 239, 110115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2026.110115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2026.110115
21. Kurniawan, R. F., Fathoni, M. W., & Mubarok, M. Z. (2024). Kinetics analysis of atmospheric agitation leaching of limonitic nickel ore in sulfuric acid by incorporating the effect of particle size distribution in shrinking core model. AIP Conference Proceedings, 3003, 020088. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0186090 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0186090
22. Larrabure, G., Batchelor, A., Salinas-Farran, L., Neethling, S. J., & Brito-Parada, P. R. (2025). Assessing surface-level processes during column leaching: A spatiotemporal and multilevel approach combining XPS and SEM-EDS. Minerals Engineering, 228, 109359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2025.109359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2025.109359
23. León, F., Rojas, L., Bazán, V., Martínez, Y., Peña, A., & Garcia, J. (2025). A systematic review of copper heap leaching: Key operational variables, green reagents, and sustainable engineering strategies. Processes, 13(5), 1513. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13051513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13051513
24. Li, J., Yang, Y., Wen, Y., Liu, W., Chu, Y., Wang, R., & Xu, Z. (2020). Leaching kinetics and mechanism of laterite with NH4 Cl-HCl solution. Minerals, 10 (9), 1–11.. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/min10090754
25. Lin, P., Ali, Z. A., & Werner, J. (2023). Investigation of the bimodal leaching response of RAM chip gold fingers in ammonia thiosulfate solution. Materials, 16(14), 4940. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16144940. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16144940
26. Liu, B., Finkel, M., & Grathwohl, P. (2021). Mass transfer principles in column percolation tests: Initial conditions and tailing in heterogeneous materials. Materials, 14(16), 4708. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14164708. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14164708
27. Liu, D., Wang, Y., Zhang, Z., & Chi, R. (2025). Enhancement of mass transfer process in column leaching by graded combination of coarse–medium–fine (C–M–F) particle packing: Application to heap leaching of ion-adsorption type rare earth ore with mixed (NH₄)₂SO₄ and NH₄Cl solution. Hydrometallurgy, 232, 106436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2025.10643. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2025.106436
28. Ljubetic, K. E. (2021). Thermodynamic and kinetic limitations of gold leaching in ferric chloride media (Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia)..
29. Ljubetic, K., & Liu, W. (2022a). Kinetic limitations of gold leaching in ferric chloride media—Part I: Batch reactor studies. Minerals Engineering, 178, 107397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2022.107397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2022.107397
30. Ljubetic, K., Deen, K. M., & Liu, W. (2022). Kinetic limitations of gold leaching in ferric chloride media—Part II: Potentiodynamic polarization and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Minerals Engineering, 179, 107433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2022.107433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2022.107433
31. Lizama, H. M. (2021). How copper dump leaching works. Minerals Engineering, 171, 107075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2021.107075. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2021.107075
32. Maghsoudy, S., Bakhtiari, O., & Maghsoudy, S. (2022). Tortuosity prediction and investigation of fluid flow behavior using pore flow approach in heap leaching. Hydrometallurgy, 211, 105868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2022.105868 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2022.105868
33. Mokmeli, M. (2020). Pre-feasibility study in hydrometallurgical treatment of low-grade chalcopyrite ores from Sarcheshmeh copper mine. Hydrometallurgy, 191, 105215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2019.105215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2019.105215
34. Moyo, A., Parbhakar-Fox, A., Meffre, S., & Cooke, D. R. (2025). An accelerated kinetic leach test for geochemical and environmental characterisation of acid and metalliferous drainage. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 38, 104092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2025.104092. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2025.104092
35. Nasab, H.M., Noaparast, M., & Abdollahi, H. (2022). Selective precipitation of iron from multi-element PLS produced by atmospheric leaching of Ni–Co bearing laterite. International Journal of Mining and Geo-Engineering. https://doi.org/10.22059/IJMGE.2022.307768.594861.
36. Nicol, M. (2022, August 13). Hydrometallurgy: Practice. Elsevier.
37. Notole, V. (2022). An investigation into the mineralogy and processing characteristics of the Elsburg reefs at South Deep Gold Mine, South Africa (Master’s thesis, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. 31787405)
38. Nwaila, G.T., Ghorbani, Y., Becker, M. et al. Geometallurgical Approach for Implications of Ore Blending on Cyanide Leaching and Adsorption Behavior of Witwatersrand Gold Ores, South Africa. Nat Resour Res 29, 1007–1030 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-019-09522-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-019-09522-4
39. O’Connor, G. M., & Eksteen, J. J. (2020). A critical review of the passivation and semiconductor mechanisms of chalcopyrite leaching. Minerals Engineering, 154, 106401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2020.106401 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2020.106401
40. Oraby, E. A., Eksteen, J. J., & O’Connor, G. M. (2020). Gold leaching from oxide ores in alkaline glycine solutions in the presence of permanganate. Hydrometallurgy, 198, 105527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2020.10552. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2020.105527
41. Ortega-Tong, P., Jamieson, J., Kuhar, L., Faulkner, L., & Prommer, H. (2023). In situ recovery of copper: Identifying mineralogical controls via model-based analysis of multistage column leach experiments. ACS ES&T Engineering, 3(6), 773–786. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestengg.2c00404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestengg.2c00404
42. Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A., Stewart, L. A., Thomas, J., Tricco, A. C., Welch, V. A., Whiting, P., & McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n160. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160
43. Pereira, A. C. (2014). Desenvolvimento de procedimento experimental para o diagnóstico de lixiviação de cobre contido em minérios oxidados [Dissertação de mestrado, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto]. eduCAPES. http://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/capes/1025997.
44. Pereira, A. C., Gomes, M. R. dos S., & Manfridini, A. P. de A. (2019). Ensaios exploratórios de lixiviação para ouro associado a minérios limoníticos. Brazilian Applied Science Review, 3(2), 1010–1022. https://doi.org/10.34115/basr.v3i2.998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34115/basr.v3i2.998
45. Pereira, A. C. (2026). Dump heap leaching systems: Engineering design, hydrodynamics, environmental control, and industrial applications. REMUNOM, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.66104/4w2dd058. DOI: https://doi.org/10.66104/4w2dd058
46. Pereira, A. C. (2026). Vat leaching and box leaching in hydrometallurgy: Process principles, industrial applications, and future perspectives. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/V9-i3-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/V9-i3-42
47. Pereira, A. C., Heck, N. B., & Gomes, M. R. dos S. (2016). Aplicação de diagnóstico de lixiviação como suporte à pesquisa mineral de minério de transição de cobre. Tecnologia em Metalurgia, Materiais e Mineração, 13(3), 242–247. https://doi.org/10.4322/2176-1523.0985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4322/2176-1523.0985
48. Petersen, J., & van Staden, P. (2025). Heap leaching: Process, principles, and practical considerations. In S. Seetharaman (Ed.), Treatise on process metallurgy (Vol. 2B: Unit processes, pp. 333–345). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-40294-4.00029-. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-40294-4.00029-3
49. Prameswara, G., Amin, I., Ulfah, A.N. et al. Atmospheric Leaching Behavior and Kinetics Study of Roasted Laterite Ore. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration 41, 1025–1033 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-024-00947-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-024-00947-x
50. Ram, R., Beiza, L., Becker, M., Pownceby, M. I., Chen, M., Yang, Y., Yang, S., & Petersen, J. (2020). Study of the leaching and pore evolution in large particles of a sulfide ore. Hydrometallurgy, 192, 105261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2020.105261 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2020.105261
51. Raschman, P., Popovič, Ľ., Kyslytsyna, M., & Sučik, G. (2025). Modelling the leaching behaviour and particle-size distribution dynamics of poly-disperse particulate solids in a batch reactor. Hydrometallurgy, 236, 106532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2025.106532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2025.106532
52. Ribeiro, P.P.M., dos Santos, I.D., Neumann, R. et al. Roasting and Leaching Behavior of Nickel Laterite Ore. Metall Mater Trans B 52, 1739–1754 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-021-02141-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-021-02141-6
53. Robertson, S. W., Basson, P., van Staden, P. J., & Petersen, J. (2023). Properties governing flow of solution and air through crushed ore for heap leaching: Part II—unsaturated dual-phase flow. Hydrometallurgy, 215, 105990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2022.105990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2022.105990
54. Saldaña, M., Gálvez, E., Robles, P., Castillo, J., & Toro, N. (2022). Copper mineral leaching mathematical models—A review. Materials, 15(5), 1757. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15051757. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15051757
55. Santos, A.L.A., Becheleni, E.M.A., Viana, P.R.M. et al. Kinetics of Atmospheric Leaching from a Brazilian Nickel Laterite Ore Allied to Redox Potential Control. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration 38, 187–201 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-020-00310-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-020-00310-w
56. Shayakhmetova, R., Mukhametzhanova, A., Osipov, P., Kali, A., Kuandykova, A., & Rakhym, A. (2025). Mechanism, kinetics and thermodynamics of nickel, iron, and magnesium hydrochloric acid leaching from laterite ore. Scientific Reports, 15, 41342. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-41342-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-25276-x
57. Stanković, S., Martin, M., Goldmann, S., Gäbler, H.-E., Ufer, K., Haubrich, F., Moutinho, V. F., Giese, E. C., Neumann, R., Stropper, J. L., Stummeyer, J., Kaufhold, S., Dohrmann, R., Oxley, A., Marbler, H., & Schippers, A. (2022). Effect of mineralogy on Co and Ni extraction from Brazilian limonitic laterites via bioleaching and chemical leaching. Minerals Engineering, 184, 107604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2022.107604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2022.107604
58. Surimbayeva, B., Bolotova, L., Akcil, A., Yessengarayev, Y., Khumarbekuly, Y., Kanaly, Y., et al. (2024). Gravity concentration of gold-bearing ores and processing of concentrates: A review. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review, 45(6), 726–750. https://doi.org/10.1080/08827508.2024.2395824. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08827508.2024.2395824
59. Thomas, M. (2021). Understanding gangue acid consumption in copper sulfide heap leaching: Predicting the impact of carbonates, silicates and secondary precipitates. Minerals Engineering, 171, 107090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2021.107090. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2021.107090
60. Top, S., Kursunoglu, S., & Ichlas, Z. T. (2020). Effects of leaching parameters on the dissolution of nickel, cobalt, manganese and iron from Caldag lateritic nickel ore in hydrochloric acid solution. Canadian Metallurgical Quarterly, 59(3), 368–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/00084433.2020.1780560. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00084433.2020.1780560
61. Ubaldini, S. (2021). Leaching kinetics of valuable metals. Metals, 11(1), 173. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11010173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/met11010173
62. van Staden, P. J., & Petersen, J. (2021). Towards fundamentally based heap leaching scale-up. Minerals Engineering, 168, 106915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2021.106915. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2021.106915
63. Wahab, Deniyatno, Saranga, M., & Supriyatna, Y. I. (2022). Kinetics study of leaching ore nickel laterite using hydrochloric acid in atmospheric pressure. Indonesian Journal of Geology and Mining, 32(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.14203/risetgeotam2022.v32.1163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14203/risetgeotam2022.v32.1163
64. Walder, I. F., Zimmer, C., & Chavez, W. X. (2022). Roll bottle vs column tests. Tailings Conference.
65. Wang, L., Yin, S., Zhang, X., Yan, Z., & Liao, W. (2022). Hydrodynamic hysteresis and solute transport in agglomerated heaps under irrigation, stacking, and bioleaching controlling. Minerals, 12(12), 1623. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12121623 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/min12121623
66. Wang, Y., Wu, Y., Fan, Y. et al. Leaching Kinetics of Limonite-Type Laterite Nickel Ore from Ammonium Hydrogen Sulfate Solution at Atmospheric Pressure. JOM 76, 6363–6375 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-024-06470-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-024-06470-0
67. Wanta, K. C., Astuti, W., Perdana, I., & Petrus, H. T. B. M. (2020). Kinetic study in atmospheric pressure organic acid leaching: Shrinking core model versus lump model. Minerals, 10(7), 613. https://doi.org/10.3390/min10070613. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/min10070613
68. Winardhi, C. W., Godinho, J. R. da A., Rachmawati, C., Achin, I. D., Iturbe, A. U., Frisch, G., & Gutzmer, J. (2022). A particle-based approach to predict the success and selectivity of leaching processes using ethaline: Comparison of simulated and experimental results. Hydrometallurgy, 211, 105869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2022.105869. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2022.105869
69. Winarko, R., Dreisinger, D. B., Miura, A., Fukano, Y., & Liu, W. (2023). Modeling the scale-up of the iodine-assisted chalcopyrite leaching in ferric sulfate media from reactors to columns and simulating heap operations. Hydrometallurgy, 222, 106203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2023.106203 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2023.106203
70. Yilmaz, S., Sirkeci, A. A., Bilen, M., & Kizgut, S. (2020). Increasing the heap leach efficiency of Uşak Kışladağ gold ore using nut shell as permeability aid. Hydrometallurgy, 198, 105520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2020.105520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2020.105520
71. Yunita, F. E., & Mubarok, M. Z. (2021). Nickel leaching from laterite ores by combination of organic and sulfuric acid. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2382, 050003. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0060750. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0060750
72. Zheng, C., Jiang, K., Cao, Z., Northwood, D. O., Waters, K. E., Wang, H., Liu, S., Zhu, K., & Ma, H. (2023). Agitation leaching behavior of copper–cobalt oxide ores from the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Minerals, 13(6), 743. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13060743. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/min13060743
73. Zhang, K., Tarbuck, G., & Shields, G. A. (2024). Refining the carbonate-associated iodine redox proxy with leaching experiments. Chemical Geology, 646, Article 121896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2023.121896. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2023.121896
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Antonio Clareti Pereira
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits the sharing of the work with proper acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal;
Authors are authorized to enter into separate, additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., posting in an institutional repository or publishing it as a book chapter), provided that authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly acknowledged, and that the work is adapted to the template of the respective repository;
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this may lead to productive exchanges and increase the impact and citation of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access);
Authors are responsible for correctly providing their personal information, including name, keywords, abstracts, and other relevant data, thereby defining how they wish to be cited. The journal’s editorial board is not responsible for any errors or inconsistencies in these records.
PRIVACY POLICY
The names and email addresses provided to this journal will be used exclusively for the purposes of this publication and will not be made available for any other purpose or to third parties.
Note: All content of the work is the sole responsibility of the author and the advisor.
