INTEGRATION OF BIOCLIMATIC INDICES FOR ASSESSING THE THERMAL COMFORT OF SWINE IN DIFFERENT HOUSING SYSTEMS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Authors

  • Rodrigo Henrique Risso Aires Alves UFAM
  • Wilson Ramos Martins UFAM
  • Estephanie Guimarães Araújo UFAM
  • Carlos Barbosa Pessoa UFAM
  • Ludimila Souza Oliveira UFAM
  • Mariana Arinana Canuto Pereira UFAM
  • Miquele Araújo dos Santos UFAM
  • André Guimarães Colares UFAM
  • Diana Lima da Silva UFAM

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66104/nk7ss794

Keywords:

THI; BGHI; Thermal comfort.

Abstract

Contemporary swine production faces severe challenges associated with heat stress, since genetic improvement contributes to lineages tailored for lean meat deposition, elevating the animals' internal heat production, whose energy dissipation is limited by their precarious thermoregulatory system. The objective was to analyze the integration and complementarity of bioclimatic indices applied in determining the thermal comfort of swine in different production systems. The methodology was based on a systematic literature review of scientific articles published between 2016 and 2026, indexed in the Scopus database, using the search string (sow OR sows OR swine) AND ("thermal comfort" OR "heat stress") AND (THI OR BGHI) AND housing. Initially, 135 articles were identified which, after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria grounded in the scope of animal ambience and precision livestock farming, resulted in a sample of 24 articles focused on the direct comparison of environmental metrics. The obtained results evidenced that the determination of thermal comfort and the typology of barn construction are indissociable phenomena. Data confrontation demonstrated that the isolated Temperature-Humidity Index (THI/ITU) presents diagnostic blind spots by disregarding the radiant heat load from roofs and wind speed. Conversely, combined use with the Black Globe Humidity Index (BGHI/ITGU) mitigates these flaws by monitoring the radiant pathway, being essential to guide the activation of cooling systems in open facilities and refine automation algorithms in climate-controlled barns under negative pressure. It is concluded that a multivariate approach is indispensable for a reliable microclimatic diagnosis, highlighting the urgent need for regional calibration of classic mathematical thresholds for the reality of low latitudes, such as the Amazonian equatorial ecosystem.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ADI, Y. K.; KIRKWOOD, R. N.; TUMMARUK, P. Newborn traits influencing piglet mortality within the first day and between days 1 and 7 after birth in highly prolific sows in tropical environments. Theriogenology, v. 246, p. 117551, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2024.117551. Acesso em: 14 mai. 2026; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2025.117551

AKKHAPHAN, T.; BOONPRAKOB, R.; GRAHOFER, A.; TUMMARUK, P. Seasonal effect on farrowing duration in sows within a temporarily confined farrowing system under tropical climates. Theriogenology, v. 238, p. 117364, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2024.117364. Acesso em: 15 mai. 2026; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2025.117364

ANUTA, A.; WANG, X.; KINAY, P. The impacts of climate change on livestock: An interdisciplinary, scoping review of health, production, and adaptation strategies. Climate Smart Agriculture, v. 2, n. 4, p. 100082, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csag.2025.100082. Acesso em: 19 mai. 2026; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csag.2025.100082

ARGANA, A.; TARAFDAR, A.; VAISHNAV, S.; GAUR, G. K.; SINGH, M.; RAHMAN, C. F.; SINGH, G.; TIWARI, R.; DUTT, T.; CHAUHAN, A. Unravelling bio-climatic thermal stress driven behavioral pattern shifts in crossbred pigs. Journal of Thermal Biology, v. 134, p. 104332, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2025.104332. Acesso em: 16 mai. 2026; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2025.104332

BAERT, S.; AUBÉ, L.; HALEY, D. B.; BERGERON, R.; DEVILLERS, N. Sows housed outdoors have distinctive approaches to thermoregulation in gestation and lactation. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, v. 248, p. 105575, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2022.105575. Acesso em: 17 mai. 2026; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2022.105575

BAERT, S.; AUBÉ, L.; HALEY, D. B.; BERGERON, R.; DEVILLERS, N. The protective role of wallowing against heat stress in gestating and lactating sows housed outdoors. Physiology & Behavior, v. 254, p. 113898, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2021.113898. Acesso em: 18 mai. 2026; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2022.113898

BJERG, B.; BRANDT, P.; PEDERSEN, P.; ZHANG, G. Sows’ responses to increased heat load – A review. Journal of Thermal Biology, v. 94, p. 102758, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2020.102758. Acesso em: 19 mai. 2026; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2020.102758

BJERG, B.; RONG, L.; ZHANG, G. Computational prediction of the effective temperature in the lying area of pig pens. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, v. 149, p. 71-79, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.09.016. Acesso em: 20 mai. 2026; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.09.016

CABEZÓN, F. A.; STEWART, K. R.; SCHINCKEL, A. P.; RICHERT, B. T. Effects of betaine and heat stress on lactation and postweaning reproductive performance of sows. The Professional Animal Scientist, v. 33, n. 2, p. 241-253, 2017. https://doi.org/10.15232/pas.2016-01571. Acesso em: 20 mai. 2026; DOI: https://doi.org/10.15232/pas.2016-01571

COLLIER, R. J.; XIAO, Y.; BAUMAN, D. E. Chapter 1 - Regulation of Factors Affecting Milk Yield. In: WATSON, R. R.; COLLIER, R. J.; PREEDY, V. R. (ed.). Nutrients in Dairy and their Implications on Health and Disease. Academic Press, 2017. p. 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809762-5.00001-2. Acesso em: 14 mai. 2026; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809762-5.00001-2

CARVAJAL, M. A.; ALANIZ, A. J.; GUTIÉRREZ-GÓMEZ, C.; VERGARA, P. M.; SEJIAN, V.; BOZINOVIC, F. Increasing importance of heat stress for cattle farming under future global climate scenarios. Science of The Total Environment, v. 801, p. 149661, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149661. Acesso em: 14 mai. 2026; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149661

CHEN, G.; ZHANG, G.; BJERG, B.; PEDERSEN, P.; JENSEN, T.; RONG, L. CFD investigation on a novel pen partition-attached jet air supply for mitigating heat stress among lactating sows. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, v. 220, p. 108840, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2024.108840. Acesso em: 15 mai. 2026; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2024.108840

GUEVARA, R. D.; LÓPEZ-VERGÉ, S.; PASTOR, J. J.; MANTECA, X.; TEDO, G.; LLONCH, P. Behavioral measurements as sensitive non-invasive indicators to assess the thermoregulatory response in weaned piglets. Livestock Science, v. 308, p. 105953, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2026.105953. Acesso em: 19 mai. 2026; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2026.105953

HU, Z.; YANG, Q.; TAO, Y.; SHI, L.; TU, J.; WANG, Y. A review of ventilation and cooling systems for large-scale pig farms. Sustainable Cities and Society, v. 89, p. 104372, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104372. Acesso em: 14 mai. 2026; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104372

DE PREKEL, L.; MAES, D.; VAN DEN BROEKE, A.; GOETHALS, S.; MILLET, S.; AMPE, B.; ALUWÉ, M. Effect of terminal sire line on heat stress responses in growing-fattening pigs selected for optimal growth rate vs optimal carcass quality. Animal, v. 19, n. 11, p. 101641, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2025.101641. Acesso em: 16 mai. 2026; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2025.101641

DUMNIEM, N.; SUWIMONTEERABUTR, J.; TUMMARUK, P. Colostrum and milk production in sows housed in free-farrowing versus crated systems under tropical conditions: Associations with sow metabolic state, oxidative stress, and piglet survival. Theriogenology, v. 247, p. 117572, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2024.117572. Acesso em: 17 mai. 2026; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2025.117572

FERREIRA, N. C. R.; ROSA, D. R.; FERREIRA, L. N.; RODRIGUES, D. C.; BARBARI, M.; CHOU, S. C.; ANDRADE, R. R. Regional impacts of heat stress on livestock in Brazil under climate change scenarios. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, v. 119, p. 108392, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2026.108392. Acesso em: 18 mai. 2026; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2026.108392

LIN, K. H.; WU, R. S.; LIN, E. C. Does the climate influence the variance of residual in litter traits of Taiwan Landrace sows? Canadian Journal of Animal Science, v. 103, n. 4, p. 355-364, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2022-0113. Acesso em: 14 mai. 2026; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2022-0113

IGLESIAS, P. M.; CAMERLINK, I. Tail posture and motion in relation to natural behaviour in juvenile and adult pigs. Animal, v. 16, n. 4, p. 100489, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2022.100489. Acesso em: 20 mai. 2026; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2022.100489

JEPPSSON, K. H.; OLSSON, A. C.; NASIRAHMADI, A. Cooling growing/finishing pigs with showers in the slatted area: Effect on animal occupation area, pen fouling and ammonia emission. Livestock Science, v. 243, p. 104377, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104377. Acesso em: 15 mai. 2026; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104377

MACHADO, N. A. F.; MARTIN, J. E.; BARBOSA-FILHO, J. A. D.; DIAS, C. T. S.; PINHEIRO, D. G.; OLIVEIRA, K. P. L.; SOUZA-JUNIOR, J. B. F. Identification of trailer heat zones and associated heat stress in weaner pigs transported by road in tropical climates. Journal of Thermal Biology, v. 97, p. 102882, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2021.102882. Acesso em: 16 mai. 2026; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2021.102882

OKE, O. E.; UYANGA, V. A.; IYASERE, O. S.; OKE, F. O.; MAJEKODUNMI, B. C.; LOGUNLEKO, M. O.; ABIONA, J. A.; NWOSU, E. U.; ABIOJA, M. O.; DARAMOLA, J. O.; ONAGBESAN, O. M. Environmental stress and livestock productivity in hot-humid tropics: Alleviation and future perspectives. Journal of Thermal Biology, v. 100, p. 103077, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2021.103077. Acesso em: 17 mai. 2026; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2021.103077

OLIVEIRA JÚNIOR, G. M.; FERREIRA, A. S.; OLIVEIRA, R. F. M.; SILVA, B. A. N.; FIGUEIREDO, E. M.; SANTOS, M. Behaviour and performance of lactating sows housed in different types of farrowing rooms during summer. Livestock Science, v. 141, n. 2–3, p. 194-201, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.06.001. Acesso em: 18 mai. 2026; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.06.001

PANG, Z.; LI, B.; XIN, H.; XI, L.; CAO, W.; WANG, C.; LI, W. Field evaluation of a water-cooled cover for cooling sows in hot and humid climates. Biosystems Engineering, v. 110, n. 4, p. 413-420, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2011.09.004. Acesso em: 19 mai. 2026; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2011.08.012

PERIC, T.; MAZZONI, C.; QUAI, F.; COTTICELLI, A.; PIVIDORI, I.; CORAZZIN, M.; COMIN, A.; BRESCIANI, C.; PRANDI, A. Sow's pre- and post-delivery in different confinement systems evaluated by hair hormones concentrations. Livestock Science, v. 272, p. 105235, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2023.105235. Acesso em: 20 mai. 2026; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2023.105235

RAMIREZ, B. C.; HOFF, S. J.; HARMON, J. D. Thermal environment sensor array: Part 2 applying the data to assess grow-finish pig housing. Biosystems Engineering, v. 174, p. 341-351, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2018.08.003. Acesso em: 14 mai. 2026; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2018.08.003

SARANG, S. K.; SREEKUMAR, D.; SEJIAN, V. Indigenous cattle biodiversity in India: Adaptation and conservation. Reproduction and Breeding, v. 4, n. 4, p. 254-266, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.repbre.2024.09.001. Acesso em: 15 mai. 2026; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.repbre.2024.09.001

SCHAUBERGER, G.; HENNIG-PAUKA, I.; ZOLLITSCH, W.; HÖRTENHUBER, S. J.; BAUMGARTNER, J.; NIEBUHR, K.; PIRINGER, M.; KNAUDER, W.; ANDERS, I.; ANDRE, K.; SCHÖNHART, M. Efficacy of adaptation measures to alleviate heat stress in confined livestock buildings in temperate climate zones. Biosystems Engineering, v. 200, p. 157-175, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2020.09.010. Acesso em: 16 mai. 2026; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2020.09.010

SCHULTHESS, L.; EGLI, P. T.; ADAM, J.; GRAHOFER, A. Influence of blood glucose level on sow traits, farrowing characteristics and piglet parameters in free farrowing sows. Animal, v. 19, n. 10, p. 101643, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2025.101643. Acesso em: 17 mai. 2026; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2025.101643

THEUSME, C.; AVENDAÑO-REYES, L.; MACÍAS-CRUZ, U.; CORREA-CALDERÓN, A.; GARCÍA-CUETO, R. O.; MELLADO, M.; VARGAS-VILLAMIL, L.; VICENTE-PÉREZ, A. Climate change vulnerability of confined livestock systems predicted using bioclimatic indexes in an arid region of México. Science of The Total Environment, v. 751, p. 141779, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141779. Acesso em: 18 mai. 2026; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141779

WABERSKI, D.; RIESENBECK, A.; SCHULZE, M.; WEITZE, K. F.; JOHNSON, L. Application of preserved boar semen for artificial insemination: Past, present and future challenges. Theriogenology, v. 137, p. 2-7, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.05.030. Acesso em: 19 mai. 2026; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.05.030

WEGNER, K.; LAMBERTZ, C.; DAŞ, G.; REINER, G.; GAULY, M. Climatic effects on sow fertility and piglet survival under influence of a moderate climate. Animal, v. 8, n. 9, p. 1526-1533, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114001219. Acesso em: 20 mai. 2026; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114001219

ZHAO, L.; LI, Y.; LI, Z. M.; WU, S.; HUANG, K.; CHEN, J.; LI, C. Effect of the valine-to-lysine ratio on the performance of sows and piglets in a hot, humid environment. Journal of Thermal Biology, v. 81, p. 89-97, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2019.02.021. Acesso em: 14 mai. 2026; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2019.02.021

ZHUANG, Y.; CAO, M.; JI, H.; LIU, Y.; LI, S.; ZHANG, J.; WANG, C.; TENG, G. A machine learning system to evaluate physiological parameters and heat stress for sows in gestation crates. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, v. 238, p. 110828, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2025.110828. Acesso em: 15 mai. 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2025.110828

Published

2026-06-04

How to Cite

INTEGRATION OF BIOCLIMATIC INDICES FOR ASSESSING THE THERMAL COMFORT OF SWINE IN DIFFERENT HOUSING SYSTEMS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW. (2026). REMUNOM, 13(12), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.66104/nk7ss794