INVESTMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION AND INNOVATION IN BRAZIL: AN ARDL TIME-SERIES ANALYSIS (2001–2019)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66104/d6gv4f09Palabras clave:
Higher Education, PatentsResumen
This study investigates the relationship between investment in higher education and innovation, measured by the proxy variable of patent applications, in Brazil from 2001 to 2019. The analysis applies Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) models to capture both short- and medium-term dynamics. The main objective is to examine whether public expenditure on higher education, in the current year and with a one-year lag, influences the innovation process, measured by the proxy variable of patent generation. The models also include other explanatory variables, such as Research & Development (R&D) expenditure outside universities, Scientific and Technical Activities (STA), and the implementation of the 2004 Innovation Law. The results indicate that the Innovation Law had a positive and statistically significant association with patent activity, suggesting that policy continuity and institutional support play an important role in promoting innovation. Current investment in higher education showed a positive short-term effect in one of the models, while lagged educational spending remained statistically weak, reinforcing the idea of delayed educational impacts. Conversely, R&D expenditure outside universities displayed a negative and significant coefficient, which may reflect inefficiencies or limited absorptive capacity in non-academic sectors. As the analysis is based on secondary data and exploratory models, the results should be interpreted as indicative rather than causal. Overall, the findings suggest that legislative and institutional frameworks contribute more immediately to innovation outcomes than isolated financial inputs. Strengthening coordination between education, research, and innovation policies appears essential for transforming public investment into sustained technological progress
Descargas
Referencias
Andrade, E. P., Rocha, A. M., Luis, M., & Nascimento, F. (2024). Contributions of Brazilian universities to technological innovation: a multivariate exploratory analysis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3895/rts.v20n60.16937 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3895/rts.v20n60.16937
Anouze, A. L., Al Khalifa, M. M., & Al-Jayyousi, O. R. (2024). Reevaluating national innovation systems: An index based on dynamic-network data envelopment analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2024.102003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2024.102003
Aparecida Da Silva, J., & Sartori, R. (2022). Motivations and barriers of universityindustry cooperation: a comparison between Brazil and Ireland. Em J. Technol. Manag. Innov. 2022 (Vol. 17, Número 2). https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718- 27242022000200049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242022000200049
Botelho, A. J. J., & Almeida, M. (2024). Start-ups in the Brazilian Innovation Ecosystem. Science, Technology and Society, 29(1), 120–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/09717218231220344 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09717218231220344
Etzkowitz, H.; Leydesdorff, L. The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, v. 29, n. 2, p. 109–123, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00055-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
Etzkowitz, H. Innovation in innovation: the Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Social Science Information, v. 42, n. 3, p. 293–337, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184030423002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184030423002
Fernandes, D. R. A., Gadelha, C. A. G., & Maldonado, J. M. S. de V. (2024). Patents, access, and local production of medicines: reflections from experiences in the SUS1. Saude e Sociedade, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902024220791en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-12902024220791pt
Huynh, A. N. Q., Vu, G. T. M., Bui, H. Q., & Hoang, H. V. (2025). Corporate investment efficiency in response to national innovation: the moderating role of state ownership. Journal of Economics and Development. https://doi.org/10.1108/JED-07-2024-0233 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JED-07-2024-0233
Ilyina, A. (2022). Mechanism of Innovation and Investment Development in Modern Economy. Economic Affairs (New Delhi), 67(4), 825–835. https://doi.org/10.46852/0424-2513.4s.2022.16 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46852/0424-2513.4s.2022.16
Karataş, A. R., Kazak, H., Akcan, A. T., Akkaş, E., & Arık, M. (2024). A bibliometric mapping analysis of the literature on patent analysis. World Patent Information, 77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2024.102266 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2024.102266
Kuhl, M. R., & Cunha, J. C. da. (2013). Obstacles to implementation of innovations in Brazil: how different companies perceive their importance. Brazilian Business Review, 10(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.15728/bbr.2013.10.2.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15728/bbr.2013.10.2.1
Mary da Silva Quintino, H., Rodrigues Holanda, F. S., Rodrigues Moura, F., Ricardo de Santana, J., & Vidal, L. D. (2021). World efficiency in the potential production of new technologies under intellectual property assets. Technology in Society, 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101601 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101601
McManus, C., Baeta Neves, A. A., Audy, J. N., & Prata, A. T. (2024a). Innovation in Brazil: Universities, Embraer and Petrobras. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias, 96(4). https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202420230938 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202420230938
McManus, C., Baeta Neves, A. A., Audy, J. N., & Prata, A. T. (2024b). Public research institutes in Brazil: evidence of research and innovation impact. Em Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2024.2396505 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2024.2396505
Motohashi, K., Ikeuchi, K., & Kwon, S. (2025). Impact of national university patenting on innovation: Researcher analysis in Japan. Technology in Society, 81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102806 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102806
Neto, N. B., Faria, L. de A., & de Melo, F. C. L. (2024). Identifying Technological Trends and Promoting Strategies to Boost Innovation and Technology Transfer: A Case Study on the Patent Portfolio of Brazilian Public Research Institutions. Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management, 16. https://doi.org/10.1590/jatm.v16.1336 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/jatm.v16.1336
Nguyen, C. P., & Doytch, N. (2022). The impact of ICT patents on economic growth: An international evidence. Telecommunications Policy, 46(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102291 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102291
Pamplona, D. A., & Pamplona, Y. de A. P. (2025). Geography of innovation: Spatial distribution of patent filings in Brazil between 1997 and 2021. Revista Aracê, 7(4), 19359–19371. https://doi.org/10.56238/arev7n4-214 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56238/arev7n4-214
Park, M., Leahey, E., & Funk, R. J. (2023). Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time. Nature, 613(7942), 138–144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05543-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05543-x
Pires, E. A., & Da Silva, K. G. V. C. (2023). A atuação dos núcleos de inovação tecnológica nas universidades: o caso brasileiro. Revista de Gestão e Secretariado (Management and Administrative Professional Review), 14(9), 15331–15355. https://doi.org/10.7769/gesec.v14i9.2653 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7769/gesec.v14i9.2653
Ramos, H. H. B., Moreira, R. M. G., Vieira, L. H. S., Berilli, S. da S., Bonjardim, L. C., Nardi, J. C., Gusmão, A. O., & Silva, L. F. (2025). Uma revisão introdutória sobre desafios e estratégias para transferência de tecnologia em icts públicas: um estudo sobre propriedade intelectual e ecossistemas de inovação no brasil. Lumen et virtus, 16(47), 3264–3286. https://doi.org/10.56238/levv16n47-024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56238/levv16n47-024
Rapini, M. S., Chiarini, T., & Stein, A. de Q. (2024). Universities in inclusive regional innovation systems: Academic engagement and uneven knowledge use in Brazil. Journal of Regional Science, 64(1), 108–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12667 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12667
Ribeiro, P. C. C., Alves de Matos Freire, K., Chudoba, K. M., & Borges Renault, T. (2022). Business incubators in Brazil: realities and challenges. Revista Gestão da Produção Operações e Sistemas, 17(4), 62. https://doi.org/10.15675/gepros.v17i4.2943 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15675/gepros.v17i4.2943
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 José Antonio Pereira da Silva, Sueli Sampaio Damin Custodio, Rene Francisco Boschi Gonçalves, Daniel Alberto Pamplona
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits the sharing of the work with proper acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal;
Authors are authorized to enter into separate, additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., posting in an institutional repository or publishing it as a book chapter), provided that authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly acknowledged, and that the work is adapted to the template of the respective repository;
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this may lead to productive exchanges and increase the impact and citation of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access);
Authors are responsible for correctly providing their personal information, including name, keywords, abstracts, and other relevant data, thereby defining how they wish to be cited. The journal’s editorial board is not responsible for any errors or inconsistencies in these records.
PRIVACY POLICY
The names and email addresses provided to this journal will be used exclusively for the purposes of this publication and will not be made available for any other purpose or to third parties.
Note: All content of the work is the sole responsibility of the author and the advisor.
