BLOCKCHAIN-ENABLED INFRASTRUCTURE FOR SECURE AND AUDITABLE AI SYSTEMS

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66104/pfc4hs96

Palavras-chave:

Artificial Intelligence, Blockchain, Medical Diagnostics, Vyper, Smart Contracts, Forensic Audit

Resumo

Security and auditability are critical requirements for AI systems deployed in enterprise and mission-critical environments. This article investigates a proof-of-concept infrastructure where blockchain technology is leveraged as an integrity layer to enhance the security posture of AI systems. Using the Breast Cancer Wisconsin (Diagnostic) Dataset as a high-stakes case study, we propose a hybrid architecture that records cryptographic hashes of model parameters and training metadata to create an immutable audit trail. To ensure experimental rigor and mitigate overfitting, the model was validated using a 70/30 stratified split and 5-fold cross-validation, achieving a validation accuracy of 98.00% alongside a sensitivity of 0.98 and an F1-score of 0.97. Our implementation demonstrates that anchoring this diagnostic model into a Vyper smart contract consumes approximately 110,472 gas. While this indicates that forensic integrity is technically viable, the results suggest that Layer 2 scaling is a functional requirement for high-frequency clinical environments to ensure economic sustainability. This approach enables post-hoc verification, supports forensic analysis, and provides a technical foundation for alignment with emerging AI risk management frameworks.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Referências

[1] Tim Abdiukov. Ethical ai integration in cybersecurity operations: A

framework for bias mitigation and human oversight in security decision

systems. Well Testing Journal, 34(S3):169–189, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5559/di.34.2.02

[2] Adetayo Adeyinka. Securing the ai supply chain: Using blockchain

for verifiable ai model version control. Technical report, ResearchGate

Preprint, 2025.

[3] A. Ali et al. Smart contracts, blockchain, and health policies: A

systematic review. MDPI Information, 13(4):104–122, 2022.

[4] PubMed Central. Blockchain and artificial intelligence technology in

e-health. Journal of Medical Systems, 8412875, 2024.

[5] Cybersecurity Forensics. Explainable ai for forensic analysis: A comparative

study of shap and lime. Cybersecurity Forensics Journal, 2025.

[6] IEEE Xplore. Vyper: A security comparison with solidity based on

common vulnerabilities. In Proceedings of the 2020 2nd Conference

on Blockchain Research & Applications for Innovative Networks and

Services (BRAINS). IEEE, 2020.

[7] F. Jamil et al. A novel patient-centric blockchain-based healthcare data

management framework. MDPI Applied Sciences, 10(21):7723, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app10217723

[8] Information Journal. Smart contracts, blockchain, and health policies:

Past, present, and future. MDPI Information, 16(10):853, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/info16100853

[9] A. Malhotra et al. Ai-blockchain integration for real-time cybersecurity:

System design and evaluation. MDPI Applied System Innovation,

5(3):59, 2025.

[10] Sensors MDPI. Using blockchain ledgers to record ai decisions in iot.

MDPI Sensors, 6(3):37, 2024.

[11] Technologies MDPI. Distributed ledger technology in healthcare:

Enhancing governance and performance. Technologies, 13(2):58, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies13020058

[12] Md Talha Mohsin. Blockchain-enabled explainable ai for trusted

healthcare systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.14987, 2025.

[13] Scientific Journal of AI. Blockchain-powered verifiable ai models for

medical diagnosis. SJAIBT, 1(1):1–9, 2024.

[14] National Institutes of Health. Ethical ai in healthcare: Integrating zeroknowledge

proofs and smart contracts. PMC Journal of Medical Ethics,

12650700, 2025.

[15] S. Pinto et al. Security of blockchain and ai-empowered smart healthcare:

Application-based analysis. MDPI Applied Sciences, 12(21):11039,

2022.

[16] Security Research. Smartllm: Smart contract auditing using custom

generative ai. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.13167, 2025.

[17] R. Sinha. Universality and compliance: Legislative demands for global

telemedicine. Journal of Healthcare Informatics, 2024.

[18] E. G. Spanakis et al. Data integrity and privacy preservation in digital

health. Frontiers in Digital Health, 3, 2021.

[19] W. H. Wolberg and O. L. Mangasarian. Multisurface method of pattern

separation for medical diagnosis applied to breast cancer. Proceedings

of the National Academy of Sciences, 87(23):9193–9196, 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.23.9193

[20] Y. Zhang, Z. Ma, and J. Meng. Auditing in the blockchain: a literature

review. Frontiers in Blockchain, 8:1549729, 2025.

Downloads

Publicado

2026-03-25

Como Citar

BLOCKCHAIN-ENABLED INFRASTRUCTURE FOR SECURE AND AUDITABLE AI SYSTEMS. (2026). REMUNOM, 13(04), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.66104/pfc4hs96