MEDIA LITERACY IN BRAZILIAN PUBLIC SCHOOLS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION (2015–2025)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66104/ndadez91Keywords:
Media Literacy, Digital Culture, Public School, Teacher Training, BNCCAbstract
The technological transformations of recent decades have brought about significant changes in
communication, production, and circulation of knowledge in contemporary society. The expansion of
the internet, social networks, and digital platforms has consolidated a scenario marked by the
intensification of information flows and the constant presence of Information and Communication
Technologies (ICTs) in daily social life. In this context, digital culture has come to directly influence
different dimensions of social life, including educational processes, requiring the development of
skills related to the critical and reflective use of media and digital technologies. Given this scenario,
media literacy emerges as a relevant educational approach for the formation of citizens capable of
understanding, analyzing, and critically interpreting the information circulating in digital environments.
By stimulating critical thinking, intellectual autonomy, and civic participation, this educational
perspective contributes to preparing students to deal with the challenges of contemporary society,
marked by informational abundance, the circulation of misinformation, and the growing influence of
digital platforms in mediating access to knowledge. In this context, the present study aimed to
analyze Brazilian scientific production published between 2015 and 2025 on media literacy in the
school environment, focusing on the context of public schools, seeking to identify theoretical trends,
methodological approaches, and challenges related to the integration of digital culture into
pedagogical practices. To this end, a systematic literature review was conducted, searching
academic databases such as SciELO, Google Scholar, and the CAPES Periodicals Portal, using
descriptors related to the investigated theme. The selected studies were analyzed using content
analysis techniques, allowing the identification of recurring thematic categories. The results indicate
advances in educational policies focused on digital culture, but also highlight challenges related to
technological infrastructure, access to technologies, and teacher training for the pedagogical use of
media.
Downloads
References
BARDIN, Laurence. Análise de conteúdo. São Paulo: Edições 70, 2016.
BRASIL. Ministério da Educação. Base Nacional Comum Curricular. Brasília:
MEC/SEB, 2017.
BRAUN, Virginia; CLARKE, Victoria. Using thematic analysis in psychology.
Qualitative Research in Psychology, v. 3, n. 2, p. 77–101, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
BUCKINGHAM, David. The media education manifesto. Cambridge: Polity Press,
2019.
CASTELLS, Manuel. A sociedade em rede. 21. ed. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 2021.
FREIRE, Paulo. Pedagogia da autonomia: saberes necessários à prática educativa.
São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 1996.
HOBBS, Renee. Media literacy in the digital age. New York: W. W. Norton, 2020.
INEP – Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira.
Censo Escolar da Educação Básica. Brasília: INEP, 2024.
JENKINS, Henry. Cultura da convergência. São Paulo: Aleph, 2009.
JENKINS, Henry; ITO, Mizuko; BOYD, Danah. Participatory culture in a networked
era: a conversation on youth, learning, commerce and politics. Cambridge: Polity
Press, 2016.
KITCHENHAM, Barbara; CHARTERS, Stuart. Guidelines for performing systematic
literature reviews in software engineering. Keele: Keele University, 2007.
LÉVY, Pierre. Cibercultura. São Paulo: Editora 34, 2010.
LIMA, Tiago; BARTHOLO, Tiago. Infraestrutura e inovação: a tecnologia nas redes
públicas de ensino. Revista Ensaio, v. 31, n. 119, 2023.
MACEDO, Luiz; PIRES, Ana; ANJOS, Carlos. Tecnologias digitais e formação
docente. Revista Práxis Educativa, v. 18, n. 3, 2022.
MORAN, José Manuel. Educação híbrida: um conceito-chave para a educação
hoje. In: BACICH, Lilian; MORAN, José (org.). Metodologias ativas para uma
educação inovadora. Porto Alegre: Penso, 2015.
PAGE, Matthew J. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for
reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, v. 372, 2021.
SCOLARI, Carlos A. Ecossistema de mídias: da teoria dos meios ao estudo das
interações comunicativas. São Paulo: Paulus, 2018.
SELWYN, Neil. Education and technology: key issues and debates. 3. ed. London:
Bloomsbury, 2022.
SILVA, João; ANDRADE, Paulo. Cultura digital e práticas docentes no Tocantins.
Revista Tocantinense de Educação, v. 6, n. 1, 2021.
SNYDER, Hannah. Literature review as a research methodology: an overview and
guidelines. Journal of Business Research, v. 104, p. 333–339, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
SOARES, Rafael. Mídia e educação: desafios contemporâneos. Revista Educação
em Debate, v. 31, n. 60, 2024.
SPINELLI, Egle Müller; SANTOS, Jéssica de Almeida. Alfabetização midiática nas
escolas. Revista Comunicação e Sociedade, v. 42, n. 2, 2020.
WARDLE, Claire; DERAKHSHAN, Hossein. Information disorder: toward an
interdisciplinary framework for research and policymaking. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2017.
WILLIAMSON, Ben; HOGAN, Anna. Commercialisation and platformisation in
education. London: Routledge, 2020.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Joilma Abreu Cabral do Vale, Marluce Evangelista Carvalho Zacariotti, Geovany Braga Soares, George Lauro Ribeiro de Brito, Jefferson da Silva Marques

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits the sharing of the work with proper acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal;
Authors are authorized to enter into separate, additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., posting in an institutional repository or publishing it as a book chapter), provided that authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly acknowledged, and that the work is adapted to the template of the respective repository;
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this may lead to productive exchanges and increase the impact and citation of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access);
Authors are responsible for correctly providing their personal information, including name, keywords, abstracts, and other relevant data, thereby defining how they wish to be cited. The journal’s editorial board is not responsible for any errors or inconsistencies in these records.
PRIVACY POLICY
The names and email addresses provided to this journal will be used exclusively for the purposes of this publication and will not be made available for any other purpose or to third parties.
Note: All content of the work is the sole responsibility of the author and the advisor.
