TEACHER TRAINING AND DIGITAL SKILLS IN THE AGE OF DATAIFICATION: A CRITICAL-SYSTEMIC ANALYSIS OF THE INTERACTIONS BETWEEN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, EDUCATIONAL GOVERNANCE, AND TEACHING PRACTICE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66104/5nyz8e97Keywords:
Teacher education; Teachers digital competence; Digital culture; Pedagogical innovation; Educational policy; Teacher professional development.Abstract
This study critically analyzes the development of teachers’ digital competencies within the context of contemporary educational culture, examining the tensions between demands for technological innovation and the structural, training, and institutional conditions that shape pedagogical practice. Based on a qualitative approach of a theoretical-analytical nature, the article conducts a systematic review of recent literature (2020–2025), using criteria inspired by the PRISMA protocol, and includes works indexed in databases such as SciELO, ERIC, CAPES, and Google Scholar. The final corpus consisted of studies selected based on criteria of theoretical relevance, methodological rigor, and adherence to the field of critical education. The results show that teachers’ digital competence constitutes a multidimensional phenomenon that transcends the technical-instrumental domain and involves pedagogical, epistemological, institutional, and political dimensions. It is found that initial teacher education presents structural limitations in the articulation between technology, pedagogy, and teaching practice, while continuing education, although recognized as strategic, tends to occur in a fragmented, decontextualized manner and guided by prescriptive logics. Furthermore, systemic barriers to technological integration have been identified, such as inadequate infrastructure, a lack of institutional support, and the persistence of traditional school cultures. The analysis indicates that innovative pedagogical practices emerge not from the mere incorporation of technologies, but from pedagogical intent, teacher autonomy, and the collective construction of knowledge within communities of practice. It is concluded that the development of teachers’ digital competencies requires structural public policies, critical and sustainable training models, as well as a redefinition of teachers’ professional identity in light of the dynamics of the digital society. The study contributes by shifting the debate from an instrumental dimension to a systemic and critical approach, offering theoretical and analytical insights for the formulation of more equitable and context-specific educational policies and practices.
Downloads
References
ADORNI, G. Artificial intelligence and cognitive transformation in education. Educational Technology Research and Development, v. 73, n. 2, p. 145–162, 2025.
ALMEIDA, M. E. B.; VALENTE, J. A. Formação de professores e tecnologias digitais: desafios contemporâneos. Educação & Sociedade, Campinas, v. 42, e0259873, 2021.
BACICH, L.; TANZI NETO, A.; TREVISANI, F. M. Ensino híbrido: personalização e tecnologia na educação. Penso Editora, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20396/tsc.v3i1.14479
BARDIN, L. Análise de conteúdo. Edições 70, 2011.
BIESTA, G. Para além da aprendizagem: educação democrática para um futuro humano. Autêntica Editora, 2022.
BRITO, G. S.; MILL, D. Educação e tecnologias digitais: políticas, práticas e formação docente. Papirus Editora, 2022.
CASTELLS, M. A sociedade em rede. Paz e Terra, 2010.
DARLING-HAMMOND, L. Preparing teachers for deeper learning. Harvard Education Press, 2021.
FANTIN, M.; RIBEIRO, M. L. Cultura digital e educação: desafios e possibilidades na formação docente. Revista Brasileira de Educação, v. 28, e280045, 2023.
FULLAN, M. The new meaning of educational change. Teachers College Press, 2020.
GIROUX, H. On critical pedagogy. Bloomsbury Academic, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350145016
HOLMES, W. Artificial intelligence in education: promise and implications for teaching and learning. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, v. 5, 2024.
KENSKI, V. M. Tecnologias e ensino presencial e a distância. Papirus Editora, 2024.
LUCKIN, R. AI for school teachers. Routledge, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003193173
MISHRA, P.; KOEHLER, M. J. Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, v. 108, n. 6, p. 1017–1054, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810610800610
MISHRA, P.; KOEHLER, M. J. TPACK in practice: emerging trends. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, v. 29, n. 1, 2021.
MOREIRA, J. A.; SCHLEMMER, E. Por um novo conceito e paradigma de educação digital. Revista UFG, v. 20, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5216/revufg.v20.63438
OLIVEIRA, T.; SANTOS, R. Políticas públicas e desigualdades digitais na educação brasileira. Cadernos de Pesquisa, v. 54, 2024.
PETKO, M. Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology integration. Computers & Education, v. 190, 2022.
PRETTO, N. L.; BONILLA, M. H. Educação e cultura digital: desafios contemporâneos. Edufba, 2021.
REDECKER, C. European framework for the digital competence of educators (DigCompEdu). Publications Office of the European Union, 2020.
SANTOS, E.; CAMARGO, L. Metodologias ativas e tecnologias digitais na educação básica. Revista Educação em Questão, v. 60, n. 64, 2022.
SELWYN, N. Education and technology: key issues and debates. Bloomsbury Academic, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350145573
SELWYN, N. Digital education in a critical perspective. Routledge, 2023.
SILVA, R. Formação docente e inteligência artificial: desafios emergentes. Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educação, v. 33, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29327/5428826.1-4
VAN DIJCK, J. The platform society: public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press, 2021.
WARSCHAUER, M. Learning in the cloud: how (and why) to transform schools with digital media. Teachers College Press, 2023.
WILLIAMSON, B. Big data in education: the digital future of learning. SAGE Publications, 2024.
WENGER, E. Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Luiz Fernando Ridolfi, Andréa da Silva Santos Leite, Luciana Maria Nickel Candeias, Wadiswava Dias Rezende Dominick Figueiredo, Graziani Vasconcelos Zanfolin, Charles Alves Correia, Emanuele Martins Teles, Maria José Cunha Freire Mendes

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits the sharing of the work with proper acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal;
Authors are authorized to enter into separate, additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., posting in an institutional repository or publishing it as a book chapter), provided that authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly acknowledged, and that the work is adapted to the template of the respective repository;
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this may lead to productive exchanges and increase the impact and citation of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access);
Authors are responsible for correctly providing their personal information, including name, keywords, abstracts, and other relevant data, thereby defining how they wish to be cited. The journal’s editorial board is not responsible for any errors or inconsistencies in these records.
PRIVACY POLICY
The names and email addresses provided to this journal will be used exclusively for the purposes of this publication and will not be made available for any other purpose or to third parties.
Note: All content of the work is the sole responsibility of the author and the advisor.
