ENGAJAMENTO SOCIAL E COMUNICAÇÃO DIGITAL NO PLANO PIAUÍ 2030: TRANSPARÊNCIA, ACCOUNTABILITY E GOVERNANÇA DEMOCRÁTICA NO CONTEXTO SUBNACIONAL BRASILEIRO
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66104/r3s2n071Keywords:
Governança digital; Transparência pública; AccountabilityAbstract
O presente artigo resulta do projeto de pesquisa de mestrado intitulado Engajamento Social e Comunicação Digital no Plano Piauí 2030: o espaço virtual como estratégia de governança sustentável e parte da premissa de que a transformação digital da administração pública demanda novas formas de comunicação e participação social capazes de promover transparência, responsabilidade e engajamento cívico. O estudo propõe análise teórica da criação do Espaço Virtual do Plano Piauí 2030, concebido como estratégia potencial de governança pública sustentável, articulando tecnologia, cidadania e gestão democrática. O objetivo consiste em examinar o potencial de uma plataforma digital voltada ao acompanhamento das metas do plano e ao fortalecimento da accountability governamental. Adota-se metodologia qualitativa e exploratória, baseada em revisão sistemática de literatura e análise documental. Os resultados indicam que, embora o Espaço Virtual ainda não tenha sido implementado, a proposta apresenta potencial para constituir ambiente de integração entre governo e sociedade, favorecendo acesso à informação, controle social e confiança institucional. Conclui-se que, uma vez desenvolvido, poderá consolidar-se como instrumento inovador de governança digital, contribuindo para o fortalecimento da gestão pública participativa e para o alcance das metas do desenvolvimento sustentável no estado do Piauí.
Downloads
References
ABRUCIO, Fernando Luiz; FRANZESE, Cibele. Federalismo e políticas públicas no Brasil: problemas de coordenação e autonomia. Revista de Administração Pública, Rio de Janeiro, v. 41, n. 2, p. 315–338, 2007.
ANSELL, Christopher; TORFING, Jacob (org.). Handbook on Theories of Governance. 2. ed. London: Routledge, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782548508.00008
ARRETCHE, Marta. Federalismo e políticas públicas no Brasil: autonomia, capacidade estatal e instituições. Rio de Janeiro: FGV, 2012.
BOVENS, Mark. Analysing and assessing public accountability: a conceptual framework. European Law Journal, v. 13, n. 4, p. 447–468, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
BOWEN, Glenn A. Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, v. 9, n. 2, p. 27–40, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
CRESWELL, John W. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4. ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2014.
CRIADO, Juan Ignacio; GIL-GARCÍA, J. Ramón. Creating public value through smart technologies: adoption of smart governance in local governments. Government Information Quarterly, v. 36, n. 3, p. 101–112, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101385
CUCCINIELLO, Maria; PORUMBESCU, Gregory; GRIMMELIKHUIJSEN, Stephan. 25 years of transparency research: evidence and future directions. Public Administration Review, v. 77, n. 1, p. 32–44, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12685 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12685
DUNLEAVY, Patrick; MARGETTS, Helen; BASTOW, Simon; TINKER, Jane. Digital Era Governance: IT Corporations, the State, and e-Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199296194.001.0001
FLICK, Uwe. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. 4. ed. London: Sage, 2009.
GRIMMELIKHUIJSEN, Stephan; FEENEY, Mary-Katherine; WELCH, Eric W. Digital transparency and public trust: simultaneous stimulation or mutual dependence? Public Administration Review, v. 82, n. 4, p. 513–528, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13456 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13456
HOOD, Christopher; HEALD, David (org.). Transparency: The Key to Better Governance? Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197263839.001.0001
KITCHIN, Rob. The Data Revolution: Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures and Their Consequences. London: SAGE, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473909472
LOTTA, Gabriela; PIRES, Roberto Rocha C.; OLIVEIRA, Vanessa Elias de. Burocracia e políticas públicas no Brasil: interseções analíticas. Brasília: Ipea, 2022.
MERGEL, Ines. Digital Transformation of the Public Sector: Government 2.0, Digital Era Governance, and Public Administration. Cham: Springer, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16256-3
MERGEL, Ines; EDELMANN, Nicola; HAUG, Nathalie. Defining digital transformation: results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, v. 36, n. 4, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002
O'DONNELL, Guillermo. Horizontal accountability in new democracies. Journal of Democracy, v. 9, n. 3, p. 112–126, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1998.0051 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1998.0051
PIAUÍ. Plano Piauí 2030: estratégia de desenvolvimento sustentável e governança digital. Teresina: SEPLAN, 2023.
SCHILLEMANS, Tim. Navigating accountability: forms, functions, and manifestations of public accountability. In: BOVENS, Mark; GOODIN, Robert E.; SCHILLEMANS, Tim (org.). The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199641253.013.0002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199641253.013.0002
LIBIDIBIA FERREA: UMA REVISÃO ABRANGENTE E POTENCIAIS APLICAÇÕES DE DIFERENTES EXTRATOS DE JUCÁ. (2026). Revista Multidisciplinar Do Nordeste Mineiro, 1(03), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.61164/xq4dqy35 DOI: https://doi.org/10.61164/xq4dqy35
A PROPOSAL FOR TEACHING METRIC RELATIONS IN RIGHT TRIANGLES. (2026). Revista Multidisciplinar Do Nordeste Mineiro, 2(01), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.61164/trsscq72 DOI: https://doi.org/10.61164/trsscq72
O AMBIENTE E OS INSTRUMENTOS DE MEDIDAS PARA AVALIAR O DESENVOLVIMENTO MOTOR DE CRIANÇAS E ADOLESCENTES: UM ESTUDO DE REVISÃO. (2026). Revista Multidisciplinar Do Nordeste Mineiro, 2(01), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.61164/cbk44936 DOI: https://doi.org/10.61164/cbk44936
TRANFIELD, David; DENYER, David; SMART, Palminder. Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, v. 14, n. 3, p. 207–222, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
UNITED NATIONS (UN). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations, 2015. Disponível em: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda. Acesso em: 1 fev. 2026.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Maira Danuse Santos de Oliveira, João Carlos Hipólito Bernardes do Nascimento
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits the sharing of the work with proper acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal;
Authors are authorized to enter into separate, additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., posting in an institutional repository or publishing it as a book chapter), provided that authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly acknowledged, and that the work is adapted to the template of the respective repository;
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this may lead to productive exchanges and increase the impact and citation of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access);
Authors are responsible for correctly providing their personal information, including name, keywords, abstracts, and other relevant data, thereby defining how they wish to be cited. The journal’s editorial board is not responsible for any errors or inconsistencies in these records.
PRIVACY POLICY
The names and email addresses provided to this journal will be used exclusively for the purposes of this publication and will not be made available for any other purpose or to third parties.
Note: All content of the work is the sole responsibility of the author and the advisor.
