THE USE OF GOOGLE PATENTS AS AN INDICATOR OF INNOVATIONS IN THE BRAZILIAN AGRIBUSINESS: AN APPROACH WITH LEXICOMETRIC ANALYSIS VIA IRAMUTEQ

Authors

  • Geferson Gustavo Wagner Mota da Silva UFSM
  • Patricia Stefani UFSM
  • Gabriel Nunes de Oliveira UFSM
  • Carolina da Rosa Oyarzabal UFSM
  • Daniel Gross UFSM
  • Eliane Ott dos Reis UFSM
  • Alessandro de Oliveira Rodrigues UFSM
  • Fouad Fabio EL Beitune Said UFSM

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66104/q1gc4m52

Keywords:

Brazilian Agribusiness; Innovations; Google Patents; Lexicometry.

Abstract

The study investigated innovation in Brazilian agribusiness using patents as an indicator, accessed via Google Patents and analyzed with the lexicometric tool IRAMUTEQ. A total of 584 patent records were collected using sector-related keywords. The analysis revealed three main technological axes. The first is agricultural biotechnology, focusing on the development of genetically modified plants. The second, automation and agricultural machinery, emphasizes smart equipment and the use of sensors. The third groups sustainable solutions, such as organic fertilizers and irrigation techniques. The similarity and word cloud analyses highlighted connections between terms such as "sustainability," "efficiency," "automation," "biotechnology," and "productivity." This indicates that the innovations primarily aim to address challenges related to efficient resource use. The results provide valuable insights for strategic direction, such as fostering collaboration between the government and companies. This partnership can leverage information on potential sector bottlenecks or gaps to channel investments into innovation and development programs in the most promising areas, thereby fostering public-private partnerships. The adopted methodology—integrating patent data with lexicometric analysis—proves to be a robust tool for monitoring technological trends and supporting the sustainable development of Brazilian agribusiness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALETTI, A. et al. The Impact of Urbanization and Industrialization on Decoupling Economic Growth from Carbon Emissions: A Case Study of China. Sustainability, v. 11, n. 3, p. 692, 2019.

BANCO MUNDIAL. World Development Report 2023: Migrants, Refugees, and Societies. Washington, DC: Banco Mundial, 2023. Disponível em: https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/wdr2023. Acesso em: 24 nov. 2025.

BRASIL. Ministério de Minas e Energia. Plano Decenal de Expansão de Energia 2032. Caderno de Demanda de Eletricidade. Superintendência de Estudos Econômicos e Energéticos. Brasília, DF: EPE – Empresa de Pesquisa Energética, out. 2022. Disponível em: https://www.epe.gov.br/sites-pt/publicacoes-dados-abertos/publicacoes/PublicacoesArquivos/publicacao-20230330100626.pdf. Acesso em: 30 jun. 2023.

CRESWELL, J. W.; CRESWELL, J. D. Projeto de pesquisa: método qualitativo, quantitativo e misto. 5. ed. Porto Alegre: Penso, 2021.

CRIPPA, M. et al. CO2 and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Our World in Data, 2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00225-9. Acesso em: 14 nov. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00225-9

DA SILVA, Geferson Gustavo Wagner Mota et al. Interfaces entre clima organizacional e estilos de liderança: da análise do estado da arte a construção de uma agenda de pesquisa. Revista de Gestão e Secretariado, v. 16, n. 1, p. e4526-e4526, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7769/gesec.v16i1.4526

EPE – EMPRESA DE PESQUISA ENERGÉTICA. Balanço Energético Nacional 2023. Brasília, DF: EPE, 2023.

EPE – EMPRESA DE PESQUISA ENERGÉTICA. Estudos Socioambientais: Emissões de Gases de Efeito Estufa. Disponível em: https://www.epe.gov.br/pt/areas-de-atuacao/meio-ambiente/emissoes-de-gases-de-efeito-estufa. Acesso em: 10 nov. 2025.

FAN, Y.; LIU, L.-C.; WU, G.; WEI, Y.-M. Analysis of Energy Efficiency of China’s Industry Sector. Energy, v. 31, n. 12, p. 2220-2232, 2006.

FIORINO, D. J. Environmental Governance and Democratic Legitimacy. Public Administration Review, v. 66, n. 3, p. 294-304, 2006.

GEELS, F. W. The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, v. 1, n. 1, p. 24-40, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002

GOLDEMBERG, José; LUCON, Oswaldo. Energia e meio ambiente no Brasil. Estudos avançados, v. 21, p. 7-20, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40142007000100003

HILBER, C. A. L.; PALMER, C. Urban Development and Air Pollution: Evidence from a Global Panel of Cities. SSRN Electronic Journal, n. 175, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2541385

HVELPLUND, F. Renewable energy and the need for local energy markets. Energy Policy, v. 34, n. 12, p. 1197-1206, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.10.004

IEA – INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY. World Energy Outlook 2020. Paris: IEA, 2020.

____. World Energy Outlook 2021. Paris: IEA, 2021.

____. World Energy Outlook 2023. Paris: IEA, 2023.

IPCC. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022.

IPEA. Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada. Disponível em: https://www.ipea.gov.br/. Acesso em: 10 nov. 2025.

JACOBSON, M. Z.; DELUCCHI, M. A. Providing all global energy with wind, water, and solar power, Part I: Technologies, energy resources, quantities and areas of infrastructure, and materials. Energy Policy, v. 39, n. 3, p. 1154-1169, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.11.040

JOHNSTONE, N.; HAŠČIČ, I.; POPP, D. Renewable energy policies and technological innovation: Evidence based on patent counts. Environmental and Resource Economics, v. 45, n. 1, p. 133-155, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-009-9309-1

KERN, F.; HOWLETT, M. Implementing transition management as policy reforms: A case study of the Dutch energy sector. Policy Sciences, v. 42, n. 4, p. 323-343, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9099-x

LEMOS, M. C.; AGRAWAL, A. Environmental governance. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, v. 31, p. 297-325, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.31.042605.135621

LOMAS, K. J. et al. The impact of retrofitting homes with energy efficiency measures on air quality and energy use: A case study. Energy and Buildings, v. 50, p. 170-181, 2012.

LUND, H. Renewable energy strategies for sustainable development. Energy, v. 32, n. 6, p. 912-919, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2006.10.017

MEADOWCROFT, J. Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, v. 1, n. 1, p. 70-75, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.003

OBSERVATÓRIO DO CLIMA. Sistema de Estimativas de Emissões de Gases de Efeito Estufa (SEEG). Disponível em: https://seeg.eco.br/. Acesso em: 10 nov. 2025.

OLIVEIRA, A. P. et al. Compreendendo os determinantes das emissões de gases de efeito estufa: implicações para políticas públicas. Revista Brasileira de Políticas Ambientais, v. 17, n. 2, p. 123-145, 2022.

PATTERSON, M. G. What is energy efficiency? Concepts, indicators and methodological issues. Energy Policy, v. 24, n. 5, p. 377-390, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-4215(96)00017-1

RAUPACH, M. R. et al. Global and Regional Drivers of Accelerating CO2 Emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 104, n. 24, p. 10288-10293, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0700609104

SCIENCEDIRECT. Emissões de gases de efeito estufa e eficiência ambiental no Brasil. Nova Economia, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/j/neco/a/r5yxTNfpKqCtgBNxKwKFCDF/?format=html. Acesso em: 10 nov. 2025.

SEEG. Sistema de Estimativas de Emissões de Gases de Efeito Estufa. Disponível em: https://seeg.eco.br/. Acesso em: 10 nov. 2025.

SETO, K. C. et al. Urbanização, emissões de carbono e sustentabilidade global. Environmental Research Letters, v. 18, n. 4, p. 045001, 2023.

SORRELL, S. et al. The economics of energy efficiency: Barriers to cost-effective investment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2004.

SORRELL, S. Reducing Energy Demand: A Review of Issues, Challenges and Approaches. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v. 47, p. 74-82, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.002

SOVACOO, B. K. The importance of comprehensiveness in renewable electricity and energy-efficiency policy. Energy Policy, v. 37, n. 4, p. 1529-1541, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.016

SOVACOOL, B. K. How long will it take? Conceptualizing the temporal dynamics of energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science, v. 13, p. 202-215, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.020

STERN, D. I. Modeling International Trends in Energy Efficiency and Carbon Emissions. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, v. 12, n. 1, p. 35-54, 2010.

UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME. Emissions Gap Report 2023. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme, 2023.

WANG, Q.; SU, M.; LI, R.; PENG, M. The Effects of Urbanization and Industrialization on Decoupling Economic Growth from Carbon Emissions. A Case Study of China. Sustainability, v. 11, n. 3, p. 692, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101758

YORK, R.; ROSA, E. A.; DIETZ, T. STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: Analytic Tools for Unpacking the Driving Forces of Environmental Impacts. Ecological Economics, v. 46, n. 3, p. 351-365, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00188-5

ZHANG, Y.; WANG, C.; WANG, F.; SU, B. Decomposition of Energy-Related Carbon Emissions in China: An Empirical Analysis Based on Provincial Panel Data. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 142, p. 755-764, 2017.

Published

2026-02-27

How to Cite

THE USE OF GOOGLE PATENTS AS AN INDICATOR OF INNOVATIONS IN THE BRAZILIAN AGRIBUSINESS: AN APPROACH WITH LEXICOMETRIC ANALYSIS VIA IRAMUTEQ. (2026). REMUNOM, 2(03), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.66104/q1gc4m52