WASTE BURNING, HEALTH, AND LOCAL GOVERNANCE: LIMITS OF PUBLIC POLICY IMPLEMENTATION IN A SOCIOENVIRONMENTALLY VULNERABLE AREA

Authors

  • Evely Laranjeira Marques Universidade Federal do Amazonas (UFAM), Brasil
  • Katarina Cordovil de Nazaré Universidade Federal do Amazonas (UFAM), Brasil
  • Thayanny Nunes de Oliveira Leite Universidade Federal do Amazonas (UFAM), Brasil
  • Yana Gomes Inhuma Universidade Federal do Amazonas (UFAM), Brasil
  • Eliakim Marques Serrão Universidade Federal do Amazonas (UFAM), Brasil
  • Rute Holanda Lopes Universidade Federal do Amazonas (UFAM), Brasil
  • Rodrigo Couto Alves Universidade Federal do Amazonas (UFAM), Brasil
  • Andrey Luis Bruyns de Sousa Instituto Federal do Amazonas (IFAM), Brasil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66104/3cn6pc48

Keywords:

Air pollution, Environmental health, Socio-environmental vulnerability, Solid waste, Public policies, Waste burning

Abstract

Air pollution resulting from the burning of solid waste in open dumps constitutes a significant public health issue, particularly in contexts marked by socio-environmental vulnerability. This study aims to analyze the impacts of exposure to smoke from waste burning on the health of populations living in surrounding areas, as well as to evaluate the role of public institutions in addressing this problem. This is a descriptive study with a qualitative approach supported by quantitative descriptive data, conducted in the municipality of Itacoatiara. Data collection was carried out through semi-structured questionnaires applied to residents of the affected area, as well as to representatives of the Primary Health Care Unit and the Municipal Department of Environment, allowing for data triangulation. The results indicate frequent exposure to smoke, a significant presence of respiratory symptoms such as coughing, shortness of breath, and eye irritation, as well as direct impacts on residents' daily lives. A low demand for healthcare services and a lack or limitation of educational actions perceived by the population were observed. In contrast, institutions reported the implementation of guidance and control measures, revealing a discrepancy between institutional discourse and community experience. The analysis indicates that the problem is not limited to the presence of the dump but is also associated with weaknesses in the territorial implementation of public policies, low institutional outreach, and limited intersectoral coordination. It is concluded that exposure to smoke represents both an environmental and institutional risk, requiring integrated strategies that connect health, environmental management, and waste governance, with emphasis on health education, continuous monitoring, and the effectiveness of public policies in vulnerable contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AGUIAR, Rafael et al. Intersetorialidade e políticas públicas em saúde: desafios na implementação territorial. Saúde e Sociedade, São Paulo, 2025.

ARAÚJO, José Patrício de et al. Educação em saúde na atenção primária: práticas e desafios contemporâneos. Revista de Saúde Pública, São Paulo, 2025.

BARDIN, Laurence. Análise de conteúdo. São Paulo: Edições 70, 2011.

BRASIL. Lei nº 11.445, de 5 de janeiro de 2007. Estabelece diretrizes nacionais para o saneamento básico. Brasília, DF: Presidência da República, 2007.

BRASIL. Lei nº 12.305, de 2 de agosto de 2010. Institui a Política Nacional de Resíduos Sólidos. Brasília, DF: Presidência da República, 2010.

BRASIL. Lei nº 14.026, de 15 de julho de 2020. Atualiza o marco legal do saneamento básico. Brasília, DF: Presidência da República, 2020.

BRASIL. Lei nº 8.080, de 19 de setembro de 1990. Dispõe sobre as condições para a promoção, proteção e recuperação da saúde, a organização e o funcionamento dos serviços correspondentes. Brasília, DF: Presidência da República, 1990.

BULLARD, Robert D. Dumping in Dixie: race, class, and environmental quality. 3. ed. Boulder: Westview Press, 2000.

BURNETT, Richard T. et al. Global estimates of mortality associated with long-term exposure to outdoor fine particulate matter. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Washington, DC, v. 115, n. 38, p. 9592-9597, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1803222115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1289/isesisee.2018.S02.04.33

CRESWELL, John W. Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. 4. ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2014.

DENZIN, Norman K. The research act: a theoretical introduction to sociological methods. 3. ed. New York: Routledge, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315134543 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315134543-1

FITTIPALDI, André Luiz et al. Educação em saúde na atenção primária: desafios e perspectivas no contexto brasileiro. Saúde em Debate, Rio de Janeiro, v. 47, n. 137, p. 123–135, 2023.

GIL, Antônio Carlos. Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. 6. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2008.

KODROS, John K. et al. Global burden of mortalities due to chronic exposure to ambient PM2.5 from open combustion of domestic waste. Environmental Research Letters, Bristol, v. 15, n. 12, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abae1e.

LANDRIGAN, Philip J. et al. The Lancet Commission on pollution and health. The Lancet, v. 391, n. 10119, p. 462–512, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32345-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32345-0

MARQUES, Eliakim. Lixão a céu aberto [Imagem]. Itacoatiara, 02 ago. 2024. Facebook: Eliakim Marques. Disponível em: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?. Acesso em: 05 abr. 2026.

MARTINEZ-ALIER, Joan. The environmentalism of the poor: a study of ecological conflicts and valuation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781843765486

MENDONÇA, Maria H. M. de et al. Atenção primária à saúde no Brasil: conceitos, práticas e desafios. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, Rio de Janeiro, v. 26, n. 2, p. 487–498, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232021262.40932020

NUTBEAM, Don. Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promotion International, Oxford, v. 15, n. 3, p. 259–267, 2000. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/15.3.259 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/15.3.259

SABATIER, Paul A.; WEIBLE, Christopher M. The advocacy coalition framework: innovations and clarifications. In: SABATIER, Paul A.; WEIBLE, Christopher M. (org.). Theories of the policy process. 3. ed. Boulder: Westview Press, 2014. p. 189–220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367274689-7

SCHRAUFNAGEL, Dean E. et al. Air pollution and noncommunicable diseases: a review by the Forum of International Respiratory Societies’ Environmental Committee, Part 1: the damaging effects of air pollution. Chest, Chicago, v. 155, n. 2, p. 409-416, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2018.10.042. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2018.10.042

SOLAR, Orielle; IRWIN, Alec. A conceptual framework for action on the social determinants of health. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2010.

WIEDINMYER, Christine et al. Global emissions of trace gases, particulate matter, and hazardous air pollutants from open burning of domestic waste. Environmental Science & Technology, v. 48, n. 16, p. 9523–9530, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/es502250z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/es502250z

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (WHO). WHO global air quality guidelines: particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide. Geneva: WHO, 2021.

Published

2026-06-01

How to Cite

WASTE BURNING, HEALTH, AND LOCAL GOVERNANCE: LIMITS OF PUBLIC POLICY IMPLEMENTATION IN A SOCIOENVIRONMENTALLY VULNERABLE AREA. (2026). REMUNOM, 13(11), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.66104/3cn6pc48