USO DE INJERTO DENTO-ÓSEO AUTÓGENO PARA LA RESTAURACIÓN DE LA VISIÓN (OSTEO-ODONTO-QUERATOPRÓTESIS): UNA REVISIÓN DE LA LITERATURA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66104/mvf5mf95Palabras clave:
Osteo-odonto-queratoprótesis, Cirugía ocular, Procedimientos quirúrgicos oftalmológicosResumen
La osteo-odonto-queratoprótesis (OOQP) es una técnica quirúrgica indicada para la rehabilitación visual en pacientes con ceguera causada por opacidad corneal severa. Consiste en la fijación de un elemento dentario autógeno como soporte biológico para una prótesis óptica, permitiendo la restauración de la función visual. Este estudio tiene como objetivo revisar la literatura sobre la OOQP, destacando sus aspectos técnicos, indicaciones y contraindicaciones clínicas, así como la importancia de la integración interdisciplinaria para el éxito del procedimiento. Las bases de datos utilizadas fueron PubMed, SciELO, BIREME y LILACS, de las cuales se recopilaron artículos mediante las siguientes palabras clave: osteo-odonto-queratoprótesis, cirugía ocular y procedimientos quirúrgicos oftalmológicos. La osteo-odonto-queratoprótesis (OOQP) representa un avance significativo en la rehabilitación visual de pacientes con opacidad corneal compleja, especialmente aquellos que no son candidatos a trasplantes corneales convencionales. Conclusión: La selección y preparación del injerto dentario, junto con la adaptación de materiales odontológicos, son etapas cruciales para lograr resultados clínicos positivos y mejorar la calidad de vida de los pacientes.
Descargas
Referencias
ALEXANDER, J. K. et al. International outcomes of the Boston type I keratoprosthesis in Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Cornea, Philadelphia, v. 34, p. 1387–1394, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000000619
AVADHANAM, V. S.; LIU, C. S. C. Keratoprostheses for corneal blindness: a review of contemporary devices. Clinical Ophthalmology, Auckland, v. 9, p. 697–720, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S27083
AVADHANAM, V. S. et al. Clinical study of laminar resorption: Part 1 – factors affecting laminar resorption. The Ocular Surface, Amsterdam, v. 18, n. 4, p. 699–705, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2020.07.010
BARBER, J. C. Keratoprostheses: past and present. International Ophthalmology Clinics, Boston, v. 28, n. 2, p. 103–109, 1988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00004397-198802820-00002
BASU, S.; PILLAI, V. S.; SANGWAN, V. S. Mucosal complications of modified osteo-odonto keratoprosthesis in chronic Stevens-Johnson syndrome. American Journal of Ophthalmology, New York, v. 156, n. 5, p. 867–873, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2013.06.012
CARDONA, H. Mushroom transcorneal keratoprosthesis. American Journal of Ophthalmology, New York, v. 68, n. 4, p. 604–612, 1969. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(69)91239-2
CHIRILA, T. V.; HICKS, C. R. The origins of the artificial cornea: Pellier de Quengsy and his contribution to the modern concept of keratoprosthesis. Gesnerus, Basel, v. 56, p. 218–231, 1999.
DE LA PAZ, M. F. et al. Impact of clinical factors on the long-term functional and anatomic outcomes of osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis and tibial bone keratoprosthesis. American Journal of Ophthalmology, New York, v. 151, n. 5, p. 829–839, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2010.11.011
DE LA PAZ, M. F. et al. Osteo-odonto-, tibial bone and Boston keratoprosthesis in clinically comparable cases. The Ocular Surface, Amsterdam, v. 17, p. 476–483, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2019.04.006
DOHLMAN, C. H.; DOANE, M. G. Prosthokeratoplasty. American Journal of Ophthalmology, New York, v. 77, n. 5, p. 694–700, 1974. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(74)90534-0
FALCINELLI, G. et al. Modified osteo-odontokeratoprosthesis for treatment of corneal blindness: long-term anatomical and functional outcomes in 181 cases. Archives of Ophthalmology, Chicago, v. 123, n. 10, p. 1319–1329, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.123.10.1319
HILLE, K. Langzeitverlauf nach Keratoprothesen mit biologischer Haptik. Der Ophthalmologe, v. 115, n. 1, p. 5-11, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-017-0503-1
HILLE, K. et al. Standards for modified osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis (OOKP) surgery according to Strampelli and Falcinelli: the Rome-Vienna protocol. Cornea, Philadelphia, v. 24, n. 8, p. 895–908, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ico.0000157401.81408.62
IYER, G. et al. Modified osteo-odonto keratoprosthesis—the Indian experience: results of the first 50 cases. Cornea, Philadelphia, v. 29, n. 7, p. 771–776, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181ca31fc
IYER, G. et al. Laminar resorption in modified osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis procedure: a cause for concern. American Journal of Ophthalmology, New York, v. 158, n. 2, p. 263–269, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2014.03.004
IYER, G. et al. Keratoprosthesis: current global scenario and a broad Indian perspective. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, Mumbai, v. 66, n. 5, p. 620–629, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_22_18
LEE, W. B. et al. Boston keratoprosthesis: outcomes and complications. Ophthalmology, San Francisco, v. 122, n. 7, p. 1504–1511, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.03.025
LIU, C. et al. Visual rehabilitation in end-stage inflammatory ocular surface disease with the osteo-odontokeratoprosthesis. British Journal of Ophthalmology, London, v. 92, n. 9, p. 1211–1217, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2007.130567
MICHAEL, R. et al. Long-term functional and anatomical results of osteo- and osteoodontokeratoprosthesis. Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, Berlin, v. 246, p. 1133–1137, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-008-0850-3
ORTIZ-MORALES, G. et al. The evolution of the modified osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis, its reliability, and long-term visual rehabilitation prognosis: an analytical review. Survey of Ophthalmology, New York, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2022.03.005
RISHI, P. et al. Vitreoretinal complications and outcomes in eyes undergoing surgery for modified osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis. Ophthalmology, San Francisco, v. 125, n. 6, p. 832–841, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.12.003
SAWATARI, Y. et al. Oral and maxillofacial surgeons’ role in the first successful modified osteo-odontokeratoprosthesis performed in the United States. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Philadelphia, v. 69, n. 6, p. 1750–1756, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2010.07.055
STRAMPELLI, B. Osteo-odontokeratoprosthesis. Annali di Ottalmologia e Clinica Oculistica, v. 89, p. 1039–1044, 1963.
TAN, A.; TAN, D. T. H.; MEHTA, J. S. Osteo-odonto keratoprosthesis: systematic review of surgical outcomes and complication rates. The Ocular Surface, Amsterdam, v. 10, n. 1, p. 15–25, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2012.01.003
TAY, A. B. G. et al. Osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis surgery: a combined ocular–oral procedure for ocular blindness. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Copenhagen, v. 36, n. 9, p. 807–813, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2007.04.009
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Cindy Meriane Alves de Oliveira, Samir de Moura Gonçalves Leite, Paula Roberta Pires Miranda, Camila da Silva Rodrigues, Natália Rivoli Rossi, Pedro Henrique Condé Oliveira Prado, Milagros Del Valle El Abras Ankha, Manassés Tercio Vieira Grangeiro
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits the sharing of the work with proper acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal;
Authors are authorized to enter into separate, additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., posting in an institutional repository or publishing it as a book chapter), provided that authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly acknowledged, and that the work is adapted to the template of the respective repository;
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this may lead to productive exchanges and increase the impact and citation of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access);
Authors are responsible for correctly providing their personal information, including name, keywords, abstracts, and other relevant data, thereby defining how they wish to be cited. The journal’s editorial board is not responsible for any errors or inconsistencies in these records.
PRIVACY POLICY
The names and email addresses provided to this journal will be used exclusively for the purposes of this publication and will not be made available for any other purpose or to third parties.
Note: All content of the work is the sole responsibility of the author and the advisor.
