THE PERSPECTIVE OF USING ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION TO ADDRESS THE SLOWNESS OF THE BRAZILIAN JUSTICE SYSTEM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61164/96fadd81Keywords:
Alternative methods, Mediation, Conciliation, Conflict resolutionAbstract
This scientific article analyzes the role of Alternative Dispute Resolution Methods in addressing the Brazilian Judiciary's delays in resolving lawsuits filed in court, particularly in the lower courts. The approach provides a contemporary reflection on the fundamental role played by conciliation and mediation. The figures in the National Council of Justice's yearbooks clearly illustrate the situation in the various courts that make up the Brazilian Judiciary. The study conducted for this article revealed that, without the use of Alternative Dispute Resolution Methods, such as conciliation, mediation, and arbitration, the current situation will not improve. However, the use of these methods has demonstrated that it is possible to address the delays in resolving judicial disputes. With this perspective in mind, there was mobilization of the Legislative and Judicial Powers, with the creation of instruments that favored the use of these methods in the various areas of Brazilian justice, notably the inclusion in Law 13.105/2015 (Code of Civil Procedure) and Resolution 125/2010, of the National Council of Justice, which instituted the National Judicial Policy for the Appropriate Treatment of Conflicts of Interest.
Downloads
References
CAMARGO, Jean Wagner. Responsabilidade Civil do Estado-Juiz: Pela Demora na Prestação Jurisdicional. Univates: 2024.
BARCELLAR, Roberto Portugal. Mediação e arbitragem: coleção saberes do direito. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2012.
BRASIL. Lei nº 13.105, de 16 de março de 2015. Código de Processo Civil. Diário Oficial [da] República Federativa do Brasil, Poder Executivo. Brasília, DF, 16 mar. 2015. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/CCIVIL_03/_Ato2015 2018/2015/Lei/L13105.htm. Acesso em: 06 de outubro de 2015. _____.
Lei nº 13.140, de 26 de junho de 2015. Lei de mediação, Poder Executivo. Brasília, DF, 26 jun. 2015. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2015 2018/2015/Lei/L13140.htm Acesso em: 17 de outubro de 2015. _____.
Conselho Nacional de Justiça. Resolução n. 125 do Conselho Nacional de Justiça. Dispõe sobre a Política Judiciária Nacional de tratamento adequado dos conflitos de interesses no âmbito do Poder Judiciário e dá outras providências. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 06 de outubro de 2015.
CONSELHO NACIONAL DE JUSTIÇA. Estudos apresentam dados sobre eficiência do uso mediação e conciliação na Justiça. Brasília, 09 de junho de 2022. Disponível em: https://www.cnj.jus.br/estudos-apresentam-dados-sobre-eficiencia-do-uso-mediacao-e-conciliacao-na-justica-brasileira /. Acesso em: 21 out. 2025.
CONSELHO NACIONAL DE JUSTIÇA. Conciliação envolve cidadão na solução de conflitos. Brasília, 26 de junho de 2020. Disponível em: https://www.cnj.jus.br/conciliacao-envolve-cidadao-na-solucao-de-conflitos//. Acesso em: 15 out. 2025
CONSELHO NACIONAL DE JUSTIÇA. Processo Eletrônico (PJe) tem tramitação mais rápida no Judiciário. Brasília, 14 de março de 2018. Disponível em: https://www.cnj.jus.br/processo-eletronico-pje-tem-tramitacao-mais-rapida-no-judiciario///. Acesso em: 15 out. 2025
Nalini J R. É urgente construir alternativas à justiça. In: Zaneti Junior H, Cabral T N X, coordenadores. Justiça Multiportas: Mediação, Conciliação, Arbitragem e outros meios de solução adequada de conflitos. Salvador: Jus Podivim, 2017, v. 09, 29 p. 3.
Mazzei R, Chagas B S R. Breve ensaio sobre a postura dos atores processuais em ralação aos métodos adequados de resolução de conflitos. In: Zaneti Junior H, Cabral T N X, coordenadores. Justiça Multiportas: Mediação, Conciliação, Arbitragem e outros meios de solução adequada de conflitos. Salvador: Jus Podivim, 2017.
CURY, Cesar. Mediação é ganha-ganha. [Março, 2017]. Rio de Janeiro: Revista Fórum. Entrevista concedida a Raphael Gomide.
VEZZULLA, Juan Carlos. Mediação. Teoria e Prática. Guia para Utilizadores e Profissionais, 2003.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Alcicley Mendes Barbosa, Jakeline Martins Silva Rocha
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits the sharing of the work with proper acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal;
Authors are authorized to enter into separate, additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., posting in an institutional repository or publishing it as a book chapter), provided that authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly acknowledged, and that the work is adapted to the template of the respective repository;
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this may lead to productive exchanges and increase the impact and citation of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access);
Authors are responsible for correctly providing their personal information, including name, keywords, abstracts, and other relevant data, thereby defining how they wish to be cited. The journal’s editorial board is not responsible for any errors or inconsistencies in these records.
PRIVACY POLICY
The names and email addresses provided to this journal will be used exclusively for the purposes of this publication and will not be made available for any other purpose or to third parties.
Note: All content of the work is the sole responsibility of the author and the advisor.
