INTERNATIONAL DOUBLE TAXATION TREATIES: LEGAL AND ECONOMIC IMPACTS IN THE BRAZILIAN CONTEXT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61164/ta2yzg58Keywords:
Double Taxation; International Treaties; Tax Law; International Taxation.Abstract
International taxation plays a crucial role in the global economic landscape, especially in the context of increasing interdependence between countries. Double taxation, characterized by the imposition of similar taxes on the same income, assets, or transactions in different jurisdictions, represents a significant challenge for multinational companies and foreign investors. To mitigate this problem, international treaties to avoid double taxation (DTTs) emerge as essential instruments, establishing clear rules for the distribution of tax jurisdiction among signatory states.
In Brazil, the main objectives of Double Taxation Treaties (DTTs) are to avoid double taxation, prevent tax evasion, and promote legal certainty, facilitating the flow of investments and international trade. However, the application of these treaties is not always peaceful, generating debates about their normative hierarchy, jurisprudential interpretation, and effectiveness in tax practice. Furthermore, Brazil's resistance to adhering to certain international standards, such as those foreseen in the OECD Model, raises questions about the country's attractiveness to foreign investors.
Given this scenario, this work aims to analyze the main double taxation treaties signed by Brazil, their effects on the economy, and their legal implications. To this end, the guiding principles of International Tax Law, doctrinal and jurisprudential interpretations on the subject, as well as the challenges and perspectives for Brazil in the context of global taxation will be addressed.
Downloads
References
BRASIL. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicao.htm. Acesso em: 27 maio 2025.
________________. Código Tributário Nacional – CTN. Lei nº 5.172, de 25 de outubro de 1966. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l5172.htm. Acesso em: 27 maio 2025.
________________. Conselho Administrativo de Recursos Fiscais (CARF). Acórdão da 1ª Turma da Câmara Superior de Recursos Fiscais – Lucros de controladas no exterior. Julgado em 7 nov. 2023. Disponível em: https://revista.ibdt.org.br/index.php/RDTIAtual/article/download/2484/2242. Acesso em: 11 ago. 2025.
________________. Secretaria da Receita Federal do Brasil. Convenções e acordos internacionais contra a dupla tributação. Disponível em: https://www.gov.br/receitafederal/pt-br/assuntos/acordos-internacionais/acordos-para-evitar-a-dupla-tributacao. Acesso em: 27 maio 2025.
________________. Superior Tribunal de Justiça. Recurso Especial n. 1.161.467/RS. Relator: Min. Mauro Campbell Marques. Julgado em 26 mai. 2010. Diário da Justiça Eletrônico, Brasília, 04 jun. 2010.
________________. Superior Tribunal de Justiça. Recurso Especial n. 1.272.897/PE. Relator: Min. Castro Meira. Julgado em 14 ago. 2012. Diário da Justiça Eletrônico, Brasília, 21 ago. 2015.
________________. Superior Tribunal de Justiça. Recurso Especial n. 1.753.262/SP. Relator: Min. Gurgel de Faria. 1ª Turma. Julgado em 10 out. 2023. Diário da Justiça Eletrônico, Brasília, 16 out. 2023.
________________. Superior Tribunal de Justiça. Recurso Especial n. 2.133.370/SP (Autosueco); Recurso Especial n. 2.133.454/SP (Mercado Livre); Recurso Especial n. 2.060.432/RS (Teracom). Determinação de afetação ao rito dos repetitivos. Comissão Gestora de Precedentes, set. 2024. Disponível em: https://www.conjur.com.br/2024-set-25/stj-deve-atentar-para-diferencas-entre-tratados-na-analise-do-irf-sobre-prestacoes-internacionais-de-servicos/. Acesso em: 06 ago. 2025.
________________. Superior Tribunal de Justiça. Recurso Especial n. 1.618.897/RJ (Caso Alcatel). Relator: Min. Herman Benjamin. 2ª Turma. Julgado em 12 nov. 2024. Diário da Justiça Eletrônico, Brasília, 18 nov. 2024.
________________. Supremo Tribunal Federal. Recurso Extraordinário n. 80.004/SE. Relator: Min. Xavier de Albuquerque. Julgado em 01 out. 1975. Diário da Justiça, Brasília, 17 out. 1975.
________________. Supremo Tribunal Federal. Recurso Extraordinário n. 206.069/RS. Relator: Min. Sepúlveda Pertence. Julgado em 16 jun. 1999. Diário da Justiça, Brasília, 06 ago. 1999.
________________. Supremo Tribunal Federal. Recurso Extraordinário n. 466.343/SP. Relator: Min. Cezar Peluso. Julgado em 03 dez. 2008. Diário da Justiça Eletrônico, Brasília, 05 jun. 2009.
________________. Supremo Tribunal Federal. Recurso Extraordinário n. 870.214/RJ. Relator: Min. Marco Aurélio (substituído pelo Min. Roberto Barroso). Pedido de vista do Min. Nunes Marques. Plenário Virtual, fev. 2025. Disponível em: https://www.siqueiracastro.com.br/noticias/stf-suspende-julgamento-sobre-tributacao-de-irpj-e-csll-de-controladas-e-coligadas-localizadas-em-paises-com-acordos-para-evitar-a-bitributacao/. Acesso em: 05 jul. 2025.
MENDES, Marcelo Quiroga. A aplicação dos tratados internacionais em matéria tributária no Brasil. Revista Dialética de Direito Tributário, São Paulo, n. 223, p. 39-51, 2014.
ORGANIZAÇÃO PARA A COOPERAÇÃO E DESENVOLVIMENTO ECONÔMICO (OCDE). Modelo de Convenção Tributária sobre a Renda e o Capital: Comentários. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2017. Disponível em: https://www.oecd.org/ctp/treaties/model-tax-convention.htm. Acesso em: 27 maio 2025.
PINTO, Gustavo Mathias Alves. Tratados internacionais em matéria tributária e sua relação com o direito interno no Brasil. Revista de Direito Tributário, São Paulo, n. 45, p. 10-25, 2020.
SCHOUERI, Luís Eduardo. Direito tributário internacional. 2. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2013.
TORRES, Heleno Taveira. Direito tributário internacional: análise dos tratados contra a bitributação da renda. 3. ed. São Paulo: Quartier Latin, 2010.
TORRES, Heleno Taveira. Direito Tributário Internacional. 2. ed. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2019.
UNITED NATIONS. United Nations Model Double Taxation Convention between Developed and Developing Countries. New York: United Nations, 2021. Disponível em: https://www.un.org/development/desa/financing/document/un-model-double-taxation-convention-2021. Acesso em: 29 maio 2025.
XAVIER, Alberto. Direito tributário internacional do Brasil. 3. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 2010.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Álex Silva Pinto, Carlos Augusto Lima Vaz da Silva

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits the sharing of the work with proper acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal;
Authors are authorized to enter into separate, additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., posting in an institutional repository or publishing it as a book chapter), provided that authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly acknowledged, and that the work is adapted to the template of the respective repository;
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this may lead to productive exchanges and increase the impact and citation of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access);
Authors are responsible for correctly providing their personal information, including name, keywords, abstracts, and other relevant data, thereby defining how they wish to be cited. The journal’s editorial board is not responsible for any errors or inconsistencies in these records.
PRIVACY POLICY
The names and email addresses provided to this journal will be used exclusively for the purposes of this publication and will not be made available for any other purpose or to third parties.
Note: All content of the work is the sole responsibility of the author and the advisor.
