WHAT STUDIES SAY ABOUT THE NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY - INCTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66104/yfkg2287Keywords:
INEQUALITIES IN SCIENCE, SCIENTIFIC CO-AUTHORSHIP, CNPq, PUBLIC POLICIES FOR SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION (ST&I), BIBLIOMETRIC IMPACTAbstract
This study analyzes the trajectory, main scientometric results, and structural impacts of the National Institutes of Science and Technology (INCT) Program. Based on a literature review, it examines the expansion of the Program from the 2014 Call for Proposals to the most recent cycle, marked by record investment and an increase in the number of institutes. The results indicate a significant increase in scientific productivity, internationalization, and the density of collaborative networks, as well as a relevant contribution to the training of highly qualified human resources and the consolidation of long-term research ecosystems. However, persistent challenges are identified, such as budgetary instability, limitations in knowledge transfer to public policies and technological innovation, regional inequalities in the distribution of institutes, and gender and racial asymmetries in leadership positions. Finally, the study reinforces the relevance of INCTs as central instruments for strengthening the Brazilian science, technology, and innovation system, proposing reflection on measures for greater equity and sustainability.
Downloads
References
BARROS, Suzane Carvalho da Vitória; MOURÃO, Luciana. Gênero e ciência: uma análise na pós-graduação brasileira. Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas), v. 37, p. e180108, 2020.
BARDIN, Laurence. Análise de conteúdo. Lisboa: Edições 70, 1977.
BOZEMAN, Barry; BOARDMAN, Craig. Research collaboration and team science: A state-of-the-art review and agenda. Springer, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06468-0
BRAGA, Patrícia Seixas da Costa; COSTA, Laís Silveira; BAHIA, Ligia. Science, Technology and Innovation and the SUS: a study on health INCTs. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, v. 30, p. e04352023, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320242911.04352023en
BRASIL. Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovações. Programa Institutos Nacionais de Ciência e Tecnologia. INCTs. 2019. Disponível em: http://inct.cnpq.br/home/. Acesso em: 31 de dezembro de 2023.
BRASIL. Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação. MCTI lança pacote de investimentos de mais R$ 3 bilhões para reduzir as desigualdades regionais. Gov.br, 10 out. 2024. Disponível em: https://www.gov.br/mcti/pt-br/acompanhe-o-mcti/noticias/2024/10/mcti-lanca-pacote-de-investimentos-de-mais-r-3-bilhoes-para-reduzir-as-desigualdades-regionais. Acesso em: 05 dez. 2025.
BRASIL. Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação. CNPq aprova 143 novos INCTs com investimento recorde de R$ 1,63 bilhão. Gov.br, 07 jul. 2025. Disponível em: https://www.gov.br/mcti/pt-br/acompanhe-o-mcti/noticias/2025/07/cnpq-aprova-143-novos-incts-com-investimento-recorde-de-r-1-63-bilhao. Acesso em: 05 dez. 2025.
CAVALCANTE, Luiz Ricardo. Desigualdades regionais em ciência, tecnologia e inovação (CT&I) no Brasil: uma análise de sua evolução recente. Texto para Discussão, 2011.
CGEE – Centro de Gestão e Estudos Estratégicos. Dados internos do Observatório de Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação (OCTI) referentes aos INCTs – atualização 2024. Brasília: CGEE, 2024.
CUNHA, Rocelly; DIMENSTEIN, Magda; DANTAS, Candida. Desigualdades de gênero por área de conhecimento na ciência brasileira: panorama das bolsistas PQ/CNPq. Saúde em Debate, v. 45, p. 83-97, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-11042021e107
DE OLIVEIRA, Maxwell Ferreira. Metodologia científica: um manual para a realização de pesquisas em Administração/Maxwell Ferreira de Oliveira. Catalão: UFG, 2011.
DO COUTO, Matheus L. et al. Characterization of co-authorship networks of CNPq productivity fellows: an approach based on data science. In: Symposium on Knowledge Discovery, Mining and Learning (KDMiLe). SBC, 2024. p. 113-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/kdmile.2024.244728
GHENO, Ediane Maria et al. Avaliação da produtividade e da coautoria dos docentes do programa de pós-graduação em ciências biológicas: bioquímica/UFRGS. Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação, v. 26, p. 1-24, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2021.78531
KOBAYASHI, Elizabete Mayumy; RIGOLIN, Camila Carneiro Dias. Mulheres, Ciência & Tecnologia: trajetórias das lideranças femininas nos Institutos Nacionais de Ciência e Tecnologia (INCTs): primeiras aproximações (2015).
Marenco, A. (2024). Can INCTs develop problem-oriented missions?. In SciELO Preprints. https://doi.org/10.1590/SciELOPreprints.8831 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/SciELOPreprints.8831
MARTINS, Márcio Souza et al. Gender Inequality in Scientific Production at Unicamp: a scientometric analysis of female participation essential for equity (2019–2023). Cogent Education, v. 12, n. 1, p. 2480502, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2480502
MAZZUCATO, Mariana. Challenges and opportunities for inclusive and sustainable innovation-led growth in Brazil: A mission-oriented approach to public-private partnerships. 2024.
MCMANUS, Concepta; BAETA NEVES, Abílio Afonso. Production profiles in Brazilian Science, with special attention to social sciences and humanities. Scientometrics, v. 126, n. 3, p. 2413-2435, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03452-2
MCMANUS Concepta,BAETA NEVES, Abílio Afonso, MARANHÃO, Andrea Queiroz, SOUZA FILHO, Antonio Gomes, SANTANA, Jaime Martins. International collaboration in Brazilian science: financing and impact. Scientometrics. 2020;125(3):2745-2772. doi: 10.1007/s11192-020-03728-7. Epub 2020 Oct 10. PMID: 33071387; PMCID: PMC7547822. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03728-7
RAMALHO, Quezia; DE SOUZA, Joice Silva; PROVETE, Diogo B. Irregular funding cycles in Brazilian science pose a barrier to biodiversity conservation and global leadership. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2025.08.002
RESENDE, Bethânia Oliveira et al. Collaborative research networks as a strategy to synthesize knowledge of Amazonian biodiversity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, v. 292, n. 2059, p. 20252069, 2025.
SIDONE, Otávio José Guerci; HADDAD, Eduardo Amaral; MENA-CHALCO, Jesús Pascual. A ciência nas regiões brasileiras: evolução da produção e das redes de colaboração científica. Transinformação, v. 28, p. 15-32, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-08892016002800002
VALENTOVA, Jaroslava V. et al. Underrepresentation of women in the senior levels of Brazilian science. PeerJ, v. 5, p. e4000, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4000
VASCONCELOS, Icaro Luiz Lage et al. Uncovering Collaboration Patterns in Brazilian Computer Science Graduate Programs Through Network Embeddings. In: Brazilian Workshop on Social Network Analysis and Mining (BraSNAM). SBC, 2025. p. 106-119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/brasnam.2025.8840
WAGNER, Caroline S.; LEYDESDORFF, Loet. Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science. Research policy, v. 34, n. 10, p. 1608-1618, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.08.002
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Douglas Fraga Silveira, Betina P Souto, Diogo Souza
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits the sharing of the work with proper acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal;
Authors are authorized to enter into separate, additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., posting in an institutional repository or publishing it as a book chapter), provided that authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly acknowledged, and that the work is adapted to the template of the respective repository;
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this may lead to productive exchanges and increase the impact and citation of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access);
Authors are responsible for correctly providing their personal information, including name, keywords, abstracts, and other relevant data, thereby defining how they wish to be cited. The journal’s editorial board is not responsible for any errors or inconsistencies in these records.
PRIVACY POLICY
The names and email addresses provided to this journal will be used exclusively for the purposes of this publication and will not be made available for any other purpose or to third parties.
Note: All content of the work is the sole responsibility of the author and the advisor.
