Institutionalizing Equity: Administrative Instruments, Public Bureaucracies, and State Action in Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66104/xeg0ea92Keywords:
equity institutionalization; state feminism; public bureaucracies; gender; state action.Abstract
This article analyzes Ordinance No. 149/2024 of the State Planning Secretariat of Piauí (SEPLAN/PI), which established the Permanent Committee on Gender, Race, Diversity, and Inclusion, in order to examine how low-level administrative instruments may contribute to the institutionalization of equity agendas within public bureaucracies. Drawing on a documentary and interpretive approach, the study examines the ordinance's normative architecture through the lenses of feminist institutionalism, state feminism, intersectionality, and the anthropology of the state and bureaucracies. It argues that the analytical significance of the document lies not merely in its normative content but in its capacity to formalize responsibilities, create organizational coordination mechanisms, and incorporate equity as a legitimate concern of state action. The analysis identifies institutionalization strategies based on permanence, organizational mainstreaming, representativeness, and administrative monitoring and reporting mechanisms. At the same time, it highlights limitations associated with hierarchical dependence, implementation conditions, the absence of robust accountability mechanisms, and challenges related to the operationalization of intersectionality. By shifting attention to administrative instruments often overlooked in the literature, the article contributes to debates on state feminism, equity institutionalization, and the everyday production of state action, demonstrating how normative commitments are translated into organizational structures within public bureaucracies.
Downloads
References
ÁLVAREZ, Sonia E. Engendering democracy in Brazil: women's movements in transition politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.
ÁLVAREZ, Sonia E. et al. Feminist bureaucracies in times of backlash: gender policies and state feminism in Latin America. Latin American Politics and Society, Cambridge, v. 66, n. 2, p. 1-28, 2024.
BAIRROS, Luiza. 1995. Nossos feminismos revisitados. Revista Estudos Feministas, 3(2):458-463.
BERNARDINO-COSTA, Joaze. Decolonialidade e interseccionalidade emancipadora: a organização política das trabalhadoras domésticas no Brasil. Sociedade e Estado, Brasília, v. 30, n. 1, p. 147-163, 2015.
BIROLI, Flávia. Ciclos de avanço e recuo nas políticas de gênero no Brasil: estrutura, conjuntura e agência feminista. Cadernos Pagu, Campinas, n. 68, e236801, 2023.
BIROLI, Flávia; MIGUEL, Luis Felipe. Gênero, Estado e políticas públicas no Brasil contemporâneo. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2023.
BOSCHI, Renato; LIMA, Maria Regina Soares de. O Executivo e a construção do Estado no Brasil: do desmonte da Era Vargas ao novo intervencionismo regulatório. In: VIANNA, Luiz Werneck (org.). A democracia e os três poderes no Brasil. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG, 2002. p. 195-253.
BRITO, Murilo M. A. et al. Diversidade e inclusão no serviço público federal brasileiro: entre a política e a prática. Revista de Administração Pública, Rio de Janeiro, v. 57, n. 3, e20220318, 2023.
CALDEIRA, Teresa Pires do Rio. Cidade de muros: crime, segregação e cidadania em São Paulo. São Paulo: Editora 34; EDUSP, 2000.
CARNEIRO, Sueli. Enegrecer o feminismo: a situação da mulher negra na América Latina a partir de uma perspectiva de gênero. In: ASHOKA EMPREENDIMENTOS SOCIAIS; TAKANO CIDADANIA (org.). Racismos contemporâneos. Rio de Janeiro: Takano Editora, 2003. p. 49-58.
COLLINS, Patricia Hill. Black feminist thought: knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. 2. ed. New York: Routledge, 2000.
CRENSHAW, Kimberlé. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, Chicago, v. 1989, n. 1, p. 139-167, 1989.
DAS, Veena; POOLE, Deborah. State and its margins: comparative ethnographies. In: DAS, Veena; POOLE, Deborah (org.). Anthropology in the margins of the State. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press, 2004. p. 3-33.
EISENSTEIN, Hester. Inside agitators: Australian femocrats and the State. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1996.
FAORO, Raymundo. Os donos do poder: formação do patronato político brasileiro. Porto Alegre: Globo, 1958.
FONSECA, Claudia. Família, fofoca e honra: etnografia de relações de gênero e violência em grupos populares. 2. ed. Porto Alegre: Editora da UFRGS, 2004.
FRASER, Nancy. Da redistribuição ao reconhecimento? Dilemas da justiça na era pós-socialista. Cadernos de Campo, São Paulo, n. 14-15, p. 231-239, 2006.
GONZALEZ, Lélia. Racismo e sexismo na cultura brasileira. Ciências Sociais Hoje, São Paulo, v. 2, p. 223-244, 1984.
GUPTA, Akhil. Red tape: bureaucracy, structural violence, and poverty in India. Durham: Duke University Press, 2012.
GUZMÁN, Virginia; MONTAÑO, Sonia. Políticas públicas e institucionalidad de género en América Latina (1985-2010). Santiago: CEPAL, 2012. (Serie Mujer y Desarrollo, n. 118).
HTUN, Mala; WELDON, S. Laurel. The civic origins of progressive policy change: combating violence against women in global perspective, 1975-2005. American Political Science Review, Cambridge, v. 106, n. 3, p. 548-569, 2012.
JELIN, Elizabeth. Feminist theory and social transformation in Latin America. Social Research, Baltimore, v. 69, n. 3, p. 865-877, 2003.
LASCOUMES, Pierre; LE GALÈS, Patrick. Introduction: understanding public policy through its instruments. Governance, Oxford, v. 20, n. 1, p. 1-21, 2007.
LOVENDUSKI, Joni. Feminizing politics. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2005.
MACKAY, Fiona; KENNY, Meryl; CHAPPELL, Louise. New institutionalism through a gender lens: towards a feminist institutionalism? International Political Science Review, London, v. 31, n. 5, p. 573-588, 2010.
MAHONEY, James; THELEN, Kathleen (org.). Explaining institutional change: ambiguity, agency, and power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
MITCHELL, Timothy. Society, economy, and the State effect. In: STEINMETZ, George (org.). State/culture: state-formation after the cultural turn. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1999. p. 76-97.
PHILLIPS, Anne. The politics of presence. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.
PIRES, Roberto; GOMIDE, Alexandre. Governança e capacidades estatais: uma análise comparativa de programas federais. Revista de Sociologia e Política, Curitiba, v. 24, n. 58, p. 121-143, 2016.
PRAÇA, Sérgio; TAYLOR, Matthew M. Incrustação e reforma institucional no Brasil. Opinião Pública, Campinas, v. 20, n. 1, p. 75-96, 2014.
RIBEIRO, Djamila. O que é lugar de fala? Belo Horizonte: Letramento, 2017.
SOUZA, Celina. Políticas públicas: uma revisão da literatura. Sociologias, Porto Alegre, v. 8, n. 16, p. 20-45, 2006.
STETSON, Dorothy McBride; MAZUR, Amy (org.). Comparative State feminism. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1995.
WERNECK, Jurema. 2010. Nossos passos vêm de longe: movimentos de mulheres negras e estratégias políticas contra o racismo e o sexismo. In: VENTURI, Gustavo; GODINHO, Tatau (orgs.). Mulheres brasileiras e gênero nos espaços público e privado. São Paulo: Fundação Perseu Abramo, p. 77-92.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Karol Jefessom Alves de Sousa, Karinna Alves Amorim de Sousa

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits the sharing of the work with proper acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal;
Authors are authorized to enter into separate, additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., posting in an institutional repository or publishing it as a book chapter), provided that authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly acknowledged, and that the work is adapted to the template of the respective repository;
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this may lead to productive exchanges and increase the impact and citation of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access);
Authors are responsible for correctly providing their personal information, including name, keywords, abstracts, and other relevant data, thereby defining how they wish to be cited. The journal’s editorial board is not responsible for any errors or inconsistencies in these records.
PRIVACY POLICY
The names and email addresses provided to this journal will be used exclusively for the purposes of this publication and will not be made available for any other purpose or to third parties.
Note: All content of the work is the sole responsibility of the author and the advisor.
