RADAR SOCIAL: MÉTRICA DE PREPARACIÓN PARA LA INNOVACIÓN SOCIAL DESDE LA PERSPECTIVA DE LA PROPIEDAD INTELECTUAL Y TRANSFERENCIA DE TECNOLOGÍA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66104/c9qxx170Palabras clave:
Innovación Social, Social Readiness Level, Propiedad Intelectual, Gobernanza de ImpactoResumen
El presente artículo investiga la estructuración de métricas de madurez aplicadas a la Innovación Social (IS). El estudio parte de la crítica a las ineficiencias alocativas de la "miopía" del impacto social y la ausencia de parámetros de madurez sociotécnica comparables al Technology Readiness Level (TRL) en el contexto de la Propiedad Intelectual (PI). El objetivo consiste en analizar la arquitectura de la plataforma Radar Social, una innovación tecnológica fundamentada en el marco Social Readiness Level (SRL). Metodológicamente, se adoptó un enfoque cualitativo, articulando los polos epistemológico, teórico, morfológico y técnico para asegurar el análisis de la intersección entre la medición de madurez, la paradoja de la privatización del conocimiento y los marcos regulatorios de la Ley de Propiedad Intelectual, demostrando que los institutos del Secreto Industrial operan como mecanismos de valoración de activos intangibles y transferencia de tecnología social. El estudio indica que la instrumentación de métricas SRL en herramientas como el Radar Social provee a las Instituciones Científicas, Tecnológicas y de Innovación (ICT) y al ecosistema de emprendimiento de impacto una estructura de gobernanza basada en evidencias para la gestión y valoración de activos. Se concluye que el modelo tecnológico asegura la eficacia y la seguridad de las inversiones en innovaciones de valor socioeconómico.
Descargas
Referencias
ANGELIDOU, M.; PSALTOGLOU, A. An empirical investigation of social innovation initiatives for sustainable urban development. Sustainable Cities and Society, v. 33, p. 113–125, ago. 2017.
AVELINO, F. et al. Transformative social innovation and (dis)empowerment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 145, p. 195 206, 2019.
ARVIDSON, Malin; LYON, Fiona; McKAY, Stephen; MORO, Domenico. Valuing the social? The nature and controversies of measuring social return on investment (SROI). Voluntary Sector Review, v. 4, n. 1, p. 3–18. 2013.
AYOB, N.; TEASDALE, S.; FAGAN, K. How social innovation “came to be”: Tracing the evolution of a contested concept. Journal of Social Policy, v. 45, n. 4, p. 635 653, 2016.
BARBOSA, D. B. Segredo industrial e o know how: aspectos jurídicos internacionais. Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris, 2008.
BARBOSA, D. B. Tratado da propriedade intelectual. Tomo IV. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris, 2025.
BAYUO, B. B.; CHAMINADE, C.; GÖRANSSON, B. Unpacking the role of universities in the emergence, development and impact of social innovations: A systematic review of the literature. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 155, 120030, 2020.
BHATT, P.; AHMAD, A. J. Financial social innovation to engage the economically marginalized: Insights from an Indian case study. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, v. 29, n. 5 6, p. 391 413, 2017.
BOCKEN, N. M. P.; SHORT, S. W.; RANA, P.; EVANS, S. A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 65, p. 42 56, 2014.
BRASIL. Lei nº 9.279, de 14 de maio de 1996. Regula direitos e obrigações relativos à propriedade industrial. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, 15 maio 1996.
BRASIL. Lei nº 9.609, de 19 de fevereiro de 1998. Dispõe sobre a proteção da propriedade intelectual de programa de computador, sua comercialização no País, e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, 20 fev. 1998.
BRASIL. Lei nº 9.610, de 19 de fevereiro de 1998. Altera, atualiza e consolida a legislação sobre direitos autorais. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, 20 fev. 1998.
BRASIL. Lei nº 13.123, de 14 de maio de 2015. Dispõe sobre o acesso ao patrimônio genético, sobre a proteção e o acesso ao conhecimento tradicional associado e sobre a repartição de benefícios. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, 14 maio 2015.
BRASIL. Lei nº 13.243, de 11 de janeiro de 2016. Dispõe sobre estímulos ao desenvolvimento científico, à pesquisa, à capacitação científica e tecnológica e à inovação. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, 12 jan. 2016.
BRASIL. Lei nº 13.709, de 14 de agosto de 2018. Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais (LGPD). Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, 15 ago. 2018.
CAJAIBA SANTANA, G. Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 82, p. 42 51, 2014.
CHAMBERS, R. Whose reality counts? Putting the first last. Londres: Intermediate Technology Publications, 1997.
CHEVALIER, J. M.; BUCKLES, D. Participatory action research: Theory and methods for engaged inquiry. Londres: Routledge, 2013.
CHOUINARD, J. A.; COUSINS, J. B. Culturally competent evaluation for Aboriginal communities: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, v. 4, n. 8, p. 40 57, 2007.
DEES, J. G.; ANDERSON, B. B.; WEI SKILLERN, J. Scaling social impact: strategies for spreading social innovations. Stanford Social Innovation Review, v. 1, n. 4, p. 24 32, 2004.
DENIS, B. Propriedade intelectual: fundamentos e dimensões. São Paulo: Atlas, 2008.
EDWARDS SCHACHTER, M.; WALLACE, M. L. ‘Shaken, not stirred’: Sixty years of defining social innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 119, p. 64 79, 2017.
EDWARDS SCHACHTER, M. E.; MATTI, C. E.; ALCÁNTARA, E. Fostering quality of life through social innovation: A living lab methodology study case. Review of Policy Research, v. 29, n. 6, p. 672 692, 2012.
ESTRELLA, M.; GAVENTA, J. Who counts reality? Participatory monitoring and evaluation: A literature review. IDS Working Paper, n. 70, 2002.
FOROUDI, P. et al. Intellectual evolution of social innovation: A bibliometric analysis and avenues for future research trends. European Journal of Innovation Management, v. 22, n. 4, p. 1 28, 2020.
FREIRE, K. de M.; DEL GAUDIO, C.; FRANZATO, C. Design driven strategies for creative social innovation ecosystems. International Journal of Knowledge Engineering and Management, v. 6, n. 16, p. 46 69, 2017.
FUJIWARA, D.; CAMPBELL, R. Valuation techniques for social cost benefit analysis: Stated preference, revealed preference and subjective well being approaches. Londres: HM Treasury, 2011.
GIFE – Grupo de Institutos, Fundações e Empresas. Censo GIFE 2024 2025: sumário executivo. São Paulo: GIFE, 2025.
GRIMM, R. et al. Social innovation, an answer to contemporary societal challenges? Locating the concept in theory and practice. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, v. 26, n. 4, p. 436 455, 2013.
GUJIT, I. Participatory approaches. In: BEKKERS, V.; TUMMERS, L. (org.). Public sector performance. Londres: Routledge, 2014. p. 171 190.
HARTMANN, A.; LINN, J. Scaling up: A framework and lessons for development effectiveness from literature and practice. Wolfensohn Center for Development Working Paper, n. 5, 2008.
HAVAS, A.; SCHARTINGER, D.; WEBER, K. M. Innovation studies, social innovation, and sustainability transitions research: from mutual ignorance towards an integrative perspective? Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, v. 48, 100754, 2023.
HÉDER, M. From NASA to EU: The evolution of the TRL scale in public sector innovation. The Innovation Journal, v. 22, n. 2, p. 1 23, 2017.
INNOVATION FUND DENMARK. Societal readiness levels (SRL) defined. Copenhague: Innovation Fund Denmark, 2019.
KUHLMANN, S.; RIP, A. Next generation innovation policy and grand challenges. Science and Public Policy, v. 45, n. 4, p. 448 454, 2018.
LANGER, A.; SCHROEDER, K. Social impact measurement: A critical perspective on SROI. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, v. 25, n. 3, p. 1 17, 2014.
LUBBERINK, R. J. B.; BLOK, V.; VAN OPHEM, J.; OMTA, O. S. W. F. Lessons for responsible innovation in the business context: a systematic literature review of responsible, social and sustainable innovation practices. Sustainability, v. 9, n. 5, p. 721, 2017.
MANKINS, J. C. Technology readiness levels: A white paper. Washington, DC: NASA, 1995.
MAYNE, J. Theory of change analysis: Building robust theories of change. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, v. 34, n. 2, p. 155 173, 2019.
METSZŐSY, G. Evaluating social innovation tools: Process oriented approach. Theory, Methodology, Practice – Review of Business and Management, v. 16, n. 1, p. 19 29, 2020.
MOULAERT, F. et al. Social innovation and governance in European cities: Urban development between path dependency and radical innovation. European Urban and Regional Studies, v. 14, n. 3, p. 195 209, 2007.
MOULAERT, F.; MEHMOOD, A. Towards a social innovation (SI) based epistemology in local development analysis: Lessons from twenty years of EU research. European Planning Studies, v. 28, n. 3, p. 434 453, 2019.
MULGAN, G. Social innovation: What it is, why it matters and how it can be accelerated. Londres: The Young Foundation, 2007.
MULYANINGSIH, H. D.; YUDOKO, G.; RUDITO, B. Knowledge based social innovation process in social enterprise: A conceptual framework. Advanced Science Letters, v. 22, n. 5 6, p. 1393 1397, 2016.
MUMFORD, M. D. Social innovation: Ten cases from Benjamin Franklin. Creativity Research Journal, v. 14, n. 2, p. 253 266, 2002.
MURRAY, R.; CAULIER GRICE, J.; MULGAN, G. The open book of social innovation. Londres: NESTA; The Young Foundation, 2010.
NICHOLLS, J. et al. A guide to Social Return on Investment. Londres: The SROI Network, 2012.
ORGANIZAÇÃO MUNDIAL DO COMÉRCIO. Acordo sobre Aspectos dos Direitos de Propriedade Intelectual Relacionados ao Comércio — Acordo TRIPS. Anexo 1C do Acordo Constitutivo da Organização Mundial do Comércio, assinado em Marrakesh, em 15 abr. 1994. Genebra: OMC, 1994.
OLSSON, P. et al. The concept of the Anthropocene as a game changer: A new context for social innovation and transformations to sustainability. Ecology and Society, v. 22, n. 2, p. 1 12, 2017.
PAGANI, R. N.; KOVALESKI, J. L.; RESENDE, L. M. M. Methodi Ordinatio: a proposed methodology to select and rank relevant scientific papers encompassing the impact factor, number of citation, and year of publication. Scientometrics, v. 105, n. 3, p. 2109-2135, 2015.
PATTON, M. Q. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3. ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2002.
PATTON, M. Q. Developmental evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. New York: Guilford Press, 2010.
PEL, B. et al. Towards a theory of transformative social innovation: A relational framework and 12 propositions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 145, p. 1 14, 2019.
PEL, B. et al. Essentialism in social innovation measurement: Pitfalls and pathways. European Public & Social Innovation Review, v. 5, n. 1, p. 1 15, 2020.
Pel, B.; WALLENBORN, G.; BAULER, T. Emergent transformation games: Exploring social innovation agency and activation through the case of the Belgian electricity blackout threat. Ecol. Soc. v. 2, 2016.
PHILLIPS, W. et al. Social innovation and social entrepreneurship: A systematic review. Group & Organization Management, v. 40, n. 3, p. 428 461, 2015.
RAO NICHOLSON, R.; VORLEY, T.; KHAN, Z. Social innovation in emerging economies: A national systems of innovation based approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 121, p. 228 237, 2017.
ROGERS, P. J. Theory of change. In: VAUGHN, G. (org.). Encyclopedia of evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2014.
SANTOS, B. de S. Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers, 2014.
SAWYER, R. K.; HENRIKSEN, D. Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation. 3. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2024.
SHAW, J. et al. Participatory evaluation in social innovation: Challenges and lessons. Evaluation, v. 24, n. 4, p. 1 19, 2018.
SMITH, I. H.; WOODWORTH, W. P. Developing social entrepreneurs and social innovators: A social identity and self efficacy approach. Academy of Management Learning & Education, v. 11, n. 3, p. 390 407, 2012.
SPRENKELING, M. et al. Bridging social and technical sciences: Introduction of the societal embeddedness level. Energies, v. 15, n. 17, 6252, 2022.
STIGLITZ, J. E. Making globalization work. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2006.
TAPLIN, D.; CLARK, H. Theory of change basics: A primer on theory of change. New York: ActKnowledge, 2012.
TRACEY, P.; STOTT, N. Social innovation: a window on alternative ways of organizing and innovating. Innovation: Organization & Management, v. 19, n. 1, p. 32–48. 2017.
VAN DER HAVE, R. P.; RUBALCABA, L. Social innovation research: An emerging area of innovation studies? Research Policy, v. 45, n. 9, p. 1923 1935, 2016.
VERMA, A.; ALLEN, T. A sociotechnical readiness level framework for the development of advanced nuclear technologies. Nuclear Technology, v. 209, p. 1722 1739, 2024.
WEISS, C. H. Nothing as practical as good theory: Exploring theory based evaluation for comprehensive community initiatives for children and families. In: CONNELL, J. P. et al. (org.). New approaches to evaluating community initiatives. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute, 1995.
WESTLEY, F. R.; ALTING, K.; GAVENTA, J.; MONTGOMERY, K.; NIKOLOVA, M. Social innovation and the dynamics of change. In: MURRAY, R.; CAULIER-GRICE, J.; MULGAN, G. The open book of social innovation. London: NESTA; The Young Foundation, p. 93-114. 2010.
WITTMAYER, J. M. et al. Narratives of change: How social innovation initiatives construct societal transformation. Futures, v. 112, p. 116 124, 2019.
WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION. World intellectual property indicators 2020. Geneva: WIPO, 2020.
YOUNG, H. P. The dynamics of social innovation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 108, n. 4, p. 21285 21291, 2011.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Msc. Maria Prazeres Costa Santos, Bela. Camila Torres Santos, Dr. Antonio Martins de Oliveira Júnior, Dr. José da Silva Rabelo Neto
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits the sharing of the work with proper acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal;
Authors are authorized to enter into separate, additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., posting in an institutional repository or publishing it as a book chapter), provided that authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly acknowledged, and that the work is adapted to the template of the respective repository;
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this may lead to productive exchanges and increase the impact and citation of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access);
Authors are responsible for correctly providing their personal information, including name, keywords, abstracts, and other relevant data, thereby defining how they wish to be cited. The journal’s editorial board is not responsible for any errors or inconsistencies in these records.
PRIVACY POLICY
The names and email addresses provided to this journal will be used exclusively for the purposes of this publication and will not be made available for any other purpose or to third parties.
Note: All content of the work is the sole responsibility of the author and the advisor.
